The Indo-Pacific and the Next Phase of ASEAN Centrality

The concept of “ASEAN centrality” emerged in the aftermath of the Cold War but renewed power rivalries in the Indo-Pacific have put its relevance under scrutiny. This study contributes to the debate on the continuity of ASEAN centrality by examining major powers’ willingness to adhere to and engage with ASEAN-led mechanisms, which we argue will have a decisive impact on the dominant form of the organisation of regional order. Our analysis shows that the major powers – China, the European Union, India, Japan, and the United States – subscribe to an enhanced role for ASEAN in the economic realm but do not see the mechanism as the first resort in political and security cooperation. ASEAN centrality is hard to continue, although a possible way out for ASEAN is to leverage its in-between position to help diffuse tensions so major powers have a stake in maintaining its centrality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034241307658
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Indo-Pacific and the Next Phase of ASEAN Centrality

Guangyu Qiao-Franco, Aleš Karmazín, Michal Kolmaš
2 citations
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Global trade and economics
1.66
article

The Indo-Pacific and the Next Phase of ASEAN Centrality

Guangyu Qiao-Franco, Aleš Karmazín, Michal Kolmaš
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The concept of “ASEAN centrality” emerged in the aftermath of the Cold War but renewed power rivalries in the Indo-Pacific have put its relevance under scrutiny. This study contributes to the debate on the continuity of ASEAN centrality by examining major powers’ willingness to adhere to and engage with ASEAN-led mechanisms, which we argue will have a decisive impact on the dominant form of the organisation of regional order. Our analysis shows that the major powers – China, the European Union, India, Japan, and the United States – subscribe to an enhanced role for ASEAN in the economic realm but do not see the mechanism as the first resort in political and security cooperation. ASEAN centrality is hard to continue, although a possible way out for ASEAN is to leverage its in-between position to help diffuse tensions so major powers have a stake in maintaining its centrality.

Journal of Current Southeast Asian AffairsVol. 44(3)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Metropolitan University Prague (CZ)
Metropolitan University Prague
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Global trade and economics
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Indo-Pacific and the Next Phase of ASEAN Centrality — Guangyu Qiao-Franco, Aleš Karmazín, et al. · Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS