Money Matters: Broad Divisia Money and the Recovery of the US Nominal GDP From the COVID‐19 Recession

ABSTRACT The rise of inflation in 2021 and 2022 surprised many macroeconomists who ignored the earlier surge in money growth because of past instability in the demand for simple‐sum monetary aggregates. We find that the demand for more theoretically based Divisia aggregates can be modeled and that these aggregates provide useful information about nominal GDP. Unlike M2 and Divisia‐M2, whose velocities do not internalize shifts in liabilities across commercial and shadow banks, the velocities of broader Divisia monetary aggregates are stable and can be empirically modeled through the Covid‐19 pandemic. In the long run, these velocities depend on regulation and mutual fund costs that affect the substitutability of money for other financial assets. In the short run, we control for swings in mortgage activity and use vaccination rates and the stringency of government pandemic restrictions to control for the unusual pandemic effects. The velocity of broad Divisia money declines during crises like the Great and COVID Recessions but later rebounds. In these recessions, monetary policy lowered short‐term interest rates to zero and engaged in quantitative easing of about $4 trillion. Nevertheless, broad money growth was more robust in the COVID Recession, reflecting a less impaired banking system that promoted rather than hindered deposit creation. Our framework implies that nominal GDP growth and inflation rebounded more quickly from the COVID Recession versus the Great Recession. Our different scenarios for future Divisia money growth and the unwinding of the pandemic have different implications for medium‐term nominal GDP growth and inflationary pressures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forecasting
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3242
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Money Matters: Broad Divisia Money and the Recovery of the US Nominal GDP From the COVID‐19 Recession

John V. Duca, Michael Bordo
7 citations
Journal of Forecasting
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
5.80
article

Money Matters: Broad Divisia Money and the Recovery of the US Nominal GDP From the COVID‐19 Recession

John V. Duca, Michael Bordo
article en
7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The rise of inflation in 2021 and 2022 surprised many macroeconomists who ignored the earlier surge in money growth because of past instability in the demand for simple‐sum monetary aggregates. We find that the demand for more theoretically based Divisia aggregates can be modeled and that these aggregates provide useful information about nominal GDP. Unlike M2 and Divisia‐M2, whose velocities do not internalize shifts in liabilities across commercial and shadow banks, the velocities of broader Divisia monetary aggregates are stable and can be empirically modeled through the Covid‐19 pandemic. In the long run, these velocities depend on regulation and mutual fund costs that affect the substitutability of money for other financial assets. In the short run, we control for swings in mortgage activity and use vaccination rates and the stringency of government pandemic restrictions to control for the unusual pandemic effects. The velocity of broad Divisia money declines during crises like the Great and COVID Recessions but later rebounds. In these recessions, monetary policy lowered short‐term interest rates to zero and engaged in quantitative easing of about $4 trillion. Nevertheless, broad money growth was more robust in the COVID Recession, reflecting a less impaired banking system that promoted rather than hindered deposit creation. Our framework implies that nominal GDP growth and inflation rebounded more quickly from the COVID Recession versus the Great Recession. Our different scenarios for future Divisia money growth and the unwinding of the pandemic have different implications for medium‐term nominal GDP growth and inflationary pressures.

Journal of ForecastingVol. 44(3)
Hoover Institution (US), National Bureau of Economic Research (US), Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (US), Oberlin College (US), Stanford University (US)
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
5.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.