Should I be held responsible for what I believe:A Comprehensive Analysis Based on Free Will and Determinism

Personal belief in responsibility has triggered extensive philosophical and moral discussions in contemporary society. The question, “Should I be responsible for what I believe?” is related to the core of two philosophy theories: free will and determinism. This theoretical discussion profoundly affects the judgment criteria of law, morality, and personal behavior. In order to better analyze this problem, this paper discusses each of the four cases and argues that there will be different answers to this question in different cases. Comprehensively, this article emphasizes that individuals should consider the rationality and universality of things before generating ideas and making corresponding behaviors, and avoid behaviors that are harmful to individuals or others as much as possible. People should be responsible for their beliefs and behaviors, especially when the behaviors will impact other people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics and Management Research
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56028/aemr.12.1.198.2024
Primary Topic
Free Will and Agency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should I be held responsible for what I believe:A Comprehensive Analysis Based on Free Will and Determinism

Zixin Wang
Advances in Economics and Management Research
Free Will and Agency
article

Should I be held responsible for what I believe:A Comprehensive Analysis Based on Free Will and Determinism

Zixin Wang
article en

Abstract

Personal belief in responsibility has triggered extensive philosophical and moral discussions in contemporary society. The question, “Should I be responsible for what I believe?” is related to the core of two philosophy theories: free will and determinism. This theoretical discussion profoundly affects the judgment criteria of law, morality, and personal behavior. In order to better analyze this problem, this paper discusses each of the four cases and argues that there will be different answers to this question in different cases. Comprehensively, this article emphasizes that individuals should consider the rationality and universality of things before generating ideas and making corresponding behaviors, and avoid behaviors that are harmful to individuals or others as much as possible. People should be responsible for their beliefs and behaviors, especially when the behaviors will impact other people.

Advances in Economics and Management ResearchVol. 12(1)
Nanjing Foreign Language School (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Free Will and Agency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.