Rivalry on Human Rights: Narratives in Human Rights Reports of the United States and China

Human rights have developed into one of the most polarizing issues within the US-China relations, reflecting deeply-rooted ideological divisions between two powers. While current studies often focus on the human rights politics of each country in isolation, there is a lack of comparative analysis of their respective human rights narratives. This study employs an innovative narrative approach to contextualise the study of human rights in the US–China competition. By examining how the US and China have competed in human rights reports during the past two decades through cluster and linguistic analysis, this study reveals divergent strategies of both powers to conceptualise human rights, assign responsibility, delegitimise the rival political systems, and undermine the rival's global reputation on human rights. The findings have implications for the fields of foreign policy narrative and the US–China relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18681026241304778
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rivalry on Human Rights: Narratives in Human Rights Reports of the United States and China

Keyu Alexander Chen
2 citations
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
8.43
article

Rivalry on Human Rights: Narratives in Human Rights Reports of the United States and China

Keyu Alexander Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Human rights have developed into one of the most polarizing issues within the US-China relations, reflecting deeply-rooted ideological divisions between two powers. While current studies often focus on the human rights politics of each country in isolation, there is a lack of comparative analysis of their respective human rights narratives. This study employs an innovative narrative approach to contextualise the study of human rights in the US–China competition. By examining how the US and China have competed in human rights reports during the past two decades through cluster and linguistic analysis, this study reveals divergent strategies of both powers to conceptualise human rights, assign responsibility, delegitimise the rival political systems, and undermine the rival's global reputation on human rights. The findings have implications for the fields of foreign policy narrative and the US–China relations.

Journal of Current Chinese AffairsVol. 54(3)
Georgia State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
8.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.