A comparison between 64-projection and 32-projection myocardial perfusion scintigraphy
The findings suggest that lower-projection techniques could be adequate for routine clinical assessments without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy. However, the poor agreement for PFR and TTPF indicates that the 32-projection method may not reliably assess diastolic function, implying that the 64-projection protocol is preferable when precise evaluations are necessary.
Authors
- Seyed Jalal Hosseinimehr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8055-8036)
- Erfan Ghadirzadeh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3903-0464)
- Amir Moradi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7307-8787)
- Alireza Mardanshahi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-3068)
- Hanie Karimi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-0437)
- Samad Golshani
- Alireza Khorrami Moghaddam
- Ali Asghar Farsavian
- Morteza Taghavi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5793-159X)
- Seyed Mohammad Abedi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-6433)
- Ali Mostafavinia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3196-5181)
- Pedram Nezhadnaderi
- Seyede Sepide Daryabari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3356-4738)
Institutions
- Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Cardiovascular Research Center (BR)
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice
- Published
- 2024-12-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae142
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00