Flow matching for atmospheric retrieval of exoplanets: Where reliability meets adaptive noise levels

Context . Inferring atmospheric properties of exoplanets from observed spectra is key to understanding their formation, evolution, and habitability. Since traditional Bayesian approaches to atmospheric retrieval (e.g., nested sampling) are computationally expensive, a growing number of machine learning (ML) methods such as neural posterior estimation (NPE) have been proposed. Aims . We seek to make ML-based atmospheric retrieval (1) more reliable and accurate with verified results, and (2) more flexible with respect to the underlying neural networks and the choice of the assumed noise models. Methods . First, we adopted flow matching posterior estimation (FMPE) as a new ML approach to atmospheric retrieval. FMPE maintains many advantages of NPE, but provides greater architectural flexibility and scalability. Second, we used importance sampling (IS) to verify and correct ML results, and to compute an estimate of the Bayesian evidence. Third, we conditioned our ML models on the assumed noise level of a spectrum (i.e., error bars), and thus made them adaptable to different noise models. Results . Both our noise-level-conditional FMPE and NPE models perform on a par with nested sampling across a range of noise levels when tested on simulated data. FMPE trains about three times faster than NPE and yields higher IS efficiencies. IS successfully corrects inaccurate ML results, identifies model failures via low efficiencies, and provides accurate estimates of the Bayesian evidence. Conclusions . FMPE is a powerful alternative to NPE for fast, amortized, and parallelizable atmospheric retrieval. IS can verify results, helping to build confidence in ML-based approaches, while also facilitating model comparison via the evidence ratio. Noise level conditioning allows design studies for future instruments to be scaled up; for example, in terms of the range of signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451861
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flow matching for atmospheric retrieval of exoplanets: Where reliability meets adaptive noise levels

Maximilian Dax, Daniel Angerhausen, Bernhard Schölkopf, Jonas Wildberger et al.
7 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
2.32
article

Flow matching for atmospheric retrieval of exoplanets: Where reliability meets adaptive noise levels

Maximilian Dax, Daniel Angerhausen, Bernhard Schölkopf, Jonas Wildberger, Timothy D. Gebhard, Sascha P. Quanz, Annalena Kofler
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Context . Inferring atmospheric properties of exoplanets from observed spectra is key to understanding their formation, evolution, and habitability. Since traditional Bayesian approaches to atmospheric retrieval (e.g., nested sampling) are computationally expensive, a growing number of machine learning (ML) methods such as neural posterior estimation (NPE) have been proposed. Aims . We seek to make ML-based atmospheric retrieval (1) more reliable and accurate with verified results, and (2) more flexible with respect to the underlying neural networks and the choice of the assumed noise models. Methods . First, we adopted flow matching posterior estimation (FMPE) as a new ML approach to atmospheric retrieval. FMPE maintains many advantages of NPE, but provides greater architectural flexibility and scalability. Second, we used importance sampling (IS) to verify and correct ML results, and to compute an estimate of the Bayesian evidence. Third, we conditioned our ML models on the assumed noise level of a spectrum (i.e., error bars), and thus made them adaptable to different noise models. Results . Both our noise-level-conditional FMPE and NPE models perform on a par with nested sampling across a range of noise levels when tested on simulated data. FMPE trains about three times faster than NPE and yields higher IS efficiencies. IS successfully corrects inaccurate ML results, identifies model failures via low efficiencies, and provides accurate estimates of the Bayesian evidence. Conclusions . FMPE is a powerful alternative to NPE for fast, amortized, and parallelizable atmospheric retrieval. IS can verify results, helping to build confidence in ML-based approaches, while also facilitating model comparison via the evidence ratio. Noise level conditioning allows design studies for future instruments to be scaled up; for example, in terms of the range of signal-to-noise ratios.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 693
ETH Zurich (CH), Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (DE), Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (DE)
National Science Foundation, International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, International Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.