The Jus ad Bellum and the War in Gaza

Abstract This article examines some of the main arguments relating to the applicability and relevance of the right of self-defence to the ongoing war in Gaza. It starts by discussing the question whether Israel has the right to invoke self-defence in response to the attack by Hamas of 7 October 2023. Questions examined include the relevance of the Wall advisory opinion of 2004 to the invocation of self-defence, the status of Gaza as occupied territory in October 2007 and the applicability of self-defence to attacks by non-State actors. It then goes on to discuss how the principles of necessity and proportionality in the context of the exercise of self-defence regulate the application of force and whether Israel’s conduct of the war meets those criteria and focuses particular attention on the impact of obstruction of relief supplies on the right of self-defence. This piece was submitted in May 2024 and does not examine or discuss events that have occurred since then.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Peacekeeping
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-27030002
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Jus ad Bellum and the War in Gaza

Terry D. Gill
Journal of International Peacekeeping
International Law and Human Rights
article

The Jus ad Bellum and the War in Gaza

Terry D. Gill
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines some of the main arguments relating to the applicability and relevance of the right of self-defence to the ongoing war in Gaza. It starts by discussing the question whether Israel has the right to invoke self-defence in response to the attack by Hamas of 7 October 2023. Questions examined include the relevance of the Wall advisory opinion of 2004 to the invocation of self-defence, the status of Gaza as occupied territory in October 2007 and the applicability of self-defence to attacks by non-State actors. It then goes on to discuss how the principles of necessity and proportionality in the context of the exercise of self-defence regulate the application of force and whether Israel’s conduct of the war meets those criteria and focuses particular attention on the impact of obstruction of relief supplies on the right of self-defence. This piece was submitted in May 2024 and does not examine or discuss events that have occurred since then.

Journal of International PeacekeepingVol. 27(3)
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Jus ad Bellum and the War in Gaza — Terry D. Gill · Journal of International Peacekeeping (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS