The Future of Our PhD Programs: Are We Giving Our PhD Students What They NEED?

At the 2024 National Academy of Kinesiology meeting, we addressed whether we are giving doctoral students what they need. Information was collected primarily by soliciting answers to open-ended questions from 14 experienced faculty mentors at Research 1 institutions. The strong themes that emerged were that training PhD students has changed and, in general, we have been slow to adapt. Students want training in skills that are transferable across a wide range of career options. Modern students are more likely to have “outside” responsibilities and want better work–life balance to manage them. This generation of students struggles with mental health and requires more flexibility and understanding than the traditional “apprentice model” has often provided. Tools like individual development plans can help establish expectations regarding workload, timeline, productivity, and so on but only if reevaluated regularly. We must maintain our high standards in terms of work quality/scientific rigor, but expecting these things requires building, rather than assuming, mutual trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kinesiology Review
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2024-0067
Primary Topic
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Future of Our PhD Programs: Are We Giving Our PhD Students What They NEED?

Lacy M. Alexander, Barry Braun
Kinesiology Review
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
article

The Future of Our PhD Programs: Are We Giving Our PhD Students What They NEED?

Lacy M. Alexander, Barry Braun
article en

Abstract

At the 2024 National Academy of Kinesiology meeting, we addressed whether we are giving doctoral students what they need. Information was collected primarily by soliciting answers to open-ended questions from 14 experienced faculty mentors at Research 1 institutions. The strong themes that emerged were that training PhD students has changed and, in general, we have been slow to adapt. Students want training in skills that are transferable across a wide range of career options. Modern students are more likely to have “outside” responsibilities and want better work–life balance to manage them. This generation of students struggles with mental health and requires more flexibility and understanding than the traditional “apprentice model” has often provided. Tools like individual development plans can help establish expectations regarding workload, timeline, productivity, and so on but only if reevaluated regularly. We must maintain our high standards in terms of work quality/scientific rigor, but expecting these things requires building, rather than assuming, mutual trust.

Kinesiology ReviewVol. 14(1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Future of Our PhD Programs: Are We Giving Our PhD Students What They NEED? — Lacy M. Alexander, Barry Braun · Kinesiology Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS