Taming the Leviathan? The Reason of State in International Law

Abstract In humanist political theory, the reason of state mostly described a course of action that did not follow the usual criteria of law but rather what was useful. Nonetheless, a broader understanding of the reason of state focused on the community’s core values. Such common interests ( ius status or ragion di stato ) could be contrasted with, and balanced against, those of the international community ( ius gentium or ragione delle genti ). According to the latter view, the reason of state did not abolish the rule of law. Rather, it indicated state governance to preserve public safety ( conservare lo stato ). The article investigates how Alberico Gentili (1552–1608), a religious refugee and Regius Professor at the University of Oxford, transplanted the reason of state from political theory into the law of nations while subjecting it to natural law ( ius naturalis ), which can be compared to the contemporary notion of jus cogens .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718050-bja10111
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taming the Leviathan? The Reason of State in International Law

Valentina Vadi
Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

Taming the Leviathan? The Reason of State in International Law

Valentina Vadi
article en

Abstract

Abstract In humanist political theory, the reason of state mostly described a course of action that did not follow the usual criteria of law but rather what was useful. Nonetheless, a broader understanding of the reason of state focused on the community’s core values. Such common interests ( ius status or ragion di stato ) could be contrasted with, and balanced against, those of the international community ( ius gentium or ragione delle genti ). According to the latter view, the reason of state did not abolish the rule of law. Rather, it indicated state governance to preserve public safety ( conservare lo stato ). The article investigates how Alberico Gentili (1552–1608), a religious refugee and Regius Professor at the University of Oxford, transplanted the reason of state from political theory into the law of nations while subjecting it to natural law ( ius naturalis ), which can be compared to the contemporary notion of jus cogens .

Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit internationalVol. 26(4)
University of Florence (IT), European University Institute (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Taming the Leviathan? The Reason of State in International Law — Valentina Vadi · Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS