Geohazard Sensitivity Evaluation in Xinning, Hunan, China, Using Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network, and Logistic Regression Algorithms

Geohazards may cause great damage to human life and property. It is of great significance to carry out geohazard sensitivity evaluation studies to recognize the development characteristics of geohazards and to predict key hazard areas. In this study, three algorithms, namely, random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and logistic regression (LR), were used to evaluate the geohazard sensitivity in Xinning, China. Through preliminary remote-sensing interpretation and field validation work, 346 geohazard sites were obtained. Nine influence factors, such as elevation, slope, slope direction, normalized vegetation index (NDVI), rainfall in 2019, distance to rivers, kernel density, distance to faults, and stratigraphic lithology, were selected according to the actual situation of the study area. Three algorithms were evaluated by comparing the size of the area under their receiver’s operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC), recall, and F1-score. The results showed that AUC values were 0.8105 (RF), 0.7654 (ANN), and 0.7855 (LR), recall values were 0.7903 (RF), 0.7334 (ANN), and 0.7500 (LR), and F1-score values were 0.7868 (RF), 0.7314 (ANN), and 0.7463 (LR). The RF algorithm had the largest AUC, recall, and F1-score values, indicating that the geohazard sensitivity evaluation model based on the RF algorithm is superior to the ANN and LR algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Hazards Review
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2138
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geohazard Sensitivity Evaluation in Xinning, Hunan, China, Using Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network, and Logistic Regression Algorithms

Yu Yan, R. G. Liu, Ce Li, Zhengqing Wang et al.
1 citations
Natural Hazards Review
Landslides and related hazards
0.71
article

Geohazard Sensitivity Evaluation in Xinning, Hunan, China, Using Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network, and Logistic Regression Algorithms

Yu Yan, R. G. Liu, Ce Li, Zhengqing Wang, Junhua Pan, Haiyang He, Zhixin Guo, Ding Hua-dong, Zhongnan Liu, Yulin Chen, L. Peng, Dinghao Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Geohazards may cause great damage to human life and property. It is of great significance to carry out geohazard sensitivity evaluation studies to recognize the development characteristics of geohazards and to predict key hazard areas. In this study, three algorithms, namely, random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and logistic regression (LR), were used to evaluate the geohazard sensitivity in Xinning, China. Through preliminary remote-sensing interpretation and field validation work, 346 geohazard sites were obtained. Nine influence factors, such as elevation, slope, slope direction, normalized vegetation index (NDVI), rainfall in 2019, distance to rivers, kernel density, distance to faults, and stratigraphic lithology, were selected according to the actual situation of the study area. Three algorithms were evaluated by comparing the size of the area under their receiver’s operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC), recall, and F1-score. The results showed that AUC values were 0.8105 (RF), 0.7654 (ANN), and 0.7855 (LR), recall values were 0.7903 (RF), 0.7334 (ANN), and 0.7500 (LR), and F1-score values were 0.7868 (RF), 0.7314 (ANN), and 0.7463 (LR). The RF algorithm had the largest AUC, recall, and F1-score values, indicating that the geohazard sensitivity evaluation model based on the RF algorithm is superior to the ANN and LR algorithms.

Natural Hazards ReviewVol. 26(2)
Geophysical Survey (RU), Bureau of Energy (TW), University of South China (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Landslides and related hazards
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.