How Social‐Symbolic Work Changes Places

Abstract We advance the social‐symbolic work perspective by developing an understanding of places as objects characterized by location, materiality, function, and symbolic meaning and which can be changed through social‐symbolic work. Drawing from a longitudinal study of the ‘Empty Homes’ Programme in England, our analysis identifies an unfolding process of social‐symbolic work through which organizational actors change three distinct places – a historic chapel hall, a village public tavern, and derelict terraced houses – into social housing. Our findings develop a theoretical model of how social‐symbolic work changes place objects through a process involving dislodging functionality of how a place is actually used, inscribing liminality , and consolidating coherence across new function, new symbolic meaning and reconstructed materiality at a fixed geographic location. This process creates a new place as a social‐symbolic object that is both stable and dynamic. Our findings and model contribute to the social‐symbolic work perspective and have broad relevance within the management studies literature to research on place and organizational and institutional change processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Studies
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13178
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Social‐Symbolic Work Changes Places

April L. Wright, Ewald Kibler, Richard Lang
2 citations
Journal of Management Studies
Management and Organizational Studies
1.35
article

How Social‐Symbolic Work Changes Places

April L. Wright, Ewald Kibler, Richard Lang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We advance the social‐symbolic work perspective by developing an understanding of places as objects characterized by location, materiality, function, and symbolic meaning and which can be changed through social‐symbolic work. Drawing from a longitudinal study of the ‘Empty Homes’ Programme in England, our analysis identifies an unfolding process of social‐symbolic work through which organizational actors change three distinct places – a historic chapel hall, a village public tavern, and derelict terraced houses – into social housing. Our findings develop a theoretical model of how social‐symbolic work changes place objects through a process involving dislodging functionality of how a place is actually used, inscribing liminality , and consolidating coherence across new function, new symbolic meaning and reconstructed materiality at a fixed geographic location. This process creates a new place as a social‐symbolic object that is both stable and dynamic. Our findings and model contribute to the social‐symbolic work perspective and have broad relevance within the management studies literature to research on place and organizational and institutional change processes.

Journal of Management StudiesVol. 62(8)
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), University of Warwick (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), Aalto University (FI)
Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Management and Organizational Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Social‐Symbolic Work Changes Places — April L. Wright, Ewald Kibler, et al. · Journal of Management Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS