Comparison of various schemes to determine the Young’s modulus of disordered carbon nanomembranes compared to crystalline graphene

The determination of mechanical properties such as the Young’s modulus provides an important means to compare classical molecular dynamics simulations with materials. In this respect, ultra-thin materials hold several challenges: their volume is ambiguous, and different methods to determine a stress–strain relation deliver different results in particular for disordered systems. Using the example of carbon nanomembranes we discuss three common approaches to the problem and show that stress–strain simulations following experimental setups deliver correct results if adjusted carefully. We provide step-by-step instructions how to perform trustworthy simulations. • Determination of Young’s modulus for disordered carbon materials. • Method is general and can be applied to other disordered materials. • Explanation why certain methods fail. • Detailed explanation how to incorporate in software LAMMPS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2024.116170
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Graphene research and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of various schemes to determine the Young’s modulus of disordered carbon nanomembranes compared to crystalline graphene

Julian Ehrens, Jürgen Schnack, Levin Mihlan
2 citations
Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures
Graphene research and applications
0.23
article

Comparison of various schemes to determine the Young’s modulus of disordered carbon nanomembranes compared to crystalline graphene

Julian Ehrens, Jürgen Schnack, Levin Mihlan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The determination of mechanical properties such as the Young’s modulus provides an important means to compare classical molecular dynamics simulations with materials. In this respect, ultra-thin materials hold several challenges: their volume is ambiguous, and different methods to determine a stress–strain relation deliver different results in particular for disordered systems. Using the example of carbon nanomembranes we discuss three common approaches to the problem and show that stress–strain simulations following experimental setups deliver correct results if adjusted carefully. We provide step-by-step instructions how to perform trustworthy simulations. • Determination of Young’s modulus for disordered carbon materials. • Method is general and can be applied to other disordered materials. • Explanation why certain methods fail. • Detailed explanation how to incorporate in software LAMMPS.

Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and NanostructuresVol. 167
Bielefeld University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Graphene research and applications
0.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.