Underestimation of Wave Energy from ERA5 Datasets: Back Analysis and Calibration in the Central Tyrrhenian Sea

Characterizing wave climate is crucial for coastal and offshore engineering applications. Reanalysis models, such as ERA5, are increasingly used due to their efficiency and lower costs compared to in situ measurements. However, their accuracy has not been thoroughly examined. This study addresses this gap by calibrating wave data from the ERA5 dataset with the available years of measurements from wave buoys in the Central Mediterranean Sea, specifically near Ponza, Cetraro, and Civitavecchia. A calibration approach was developed to adjust ERA5 wave data by aligning the model predictions closely with the co-located wave buoy observations. Results indicate that ERA5 systematically underestimates significant wave heights and periods, leading to an underestimation of wave power by up to 42% compared to buoy data. Calibration improved alignment between ERA5 and buoy measurements, enhancing wave energy representation and increasing estimated wave power by 35–48% annually. These findings underscore the importance of calibrating reanalysis datasets like ERA5 with in situ data to accurately assess wave energy potential, particularly in regions where model data may not fully capture local wave conditions. The outcomes provide valuable insights for wave energy projects in the Central Tyrrhenian Sea and similar semi-enclosed seas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18010003
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underestimation of Wave Energy from ERA5 Datasets: Back Analysis and Calibration in the Central Tyrrhenian Sea

Sara Russo, Diego Vicinanza, Carlo Lo Re, Pasquale Contestabile et al.
3 citations
Energies
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
1.44
article

Underestimation of Wave Energy from ERA5 Datasets: Back Analysis and Calibration in the Central Tyrrhenian Sea

Sara Russo, Diego Vicinanza, Carlo Lo Re, Pasquale Contestabile, Lateef Adesola Afolabi, Giovanni Ludeno, Gabriele Nardone
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Characterizing wave climate is crucial for coastal and offshore engineering applications. Reanalysis models, such as ERA5, are increasingly used due to their efficiency and lower costs compared to in situ measurements. However, their accuracy has not been thoroughly examined. This study addresses this gap by calibrating wave data from the ERA5 dataset with the available years of measurements from wave buoys in the Central Mediterranean Sea, specifically near Ponza, Cetraro, and Civitavecchia. A calibration approach was developed to adjust ERA5 wave data by aligning the model predictions closely with the co-located wave buoy observations. Results indicate that ERA5 systematically underestimates significant wave heights and periods, leading to an underestimation of wave power by up to 42% compared to buoy data. Calibration improved alignment between ERA5 and buoy measurements, enhancing wave energy representation and increasing estimated wave power by 35–48% annually. These findings underscore the importance of calibrating reanalysis datasets like ERA5 with in situ data to accurately assess wave energy potential, particularly in regions where model data may not fully capture local wave conditions. The outcomes provide valuable insights for wave energy projects in the Central Tyrrhenian Sea and similar semi-enclosed seas.

EnergiesVol. 18(1)
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (IT), Istituto per il Rilevamento Elettromagnetico dell'Ambiente (IT), National Research Council (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
1.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.