Digital-Tier Strategy Improves Newborn Screening for Glutaric Aciduria Type 1

Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1) is a rare inherited metabolic disease increasingly included in newborn screening (NBS) programs worldwide. Because of the broad biochemical spectrum of individuals with GA1 and the lack of reliable second-tier strategies, NBS for GA1 is still confronted with a high rate of false positives. In this study, we aim to increase the specificity of NBS for GA1 and, hence, to reduce the rate of false positives through machine learning methods. Therefore, we studied NBS profiles from 1,025,953 newborns screened between 2014 and 2023 at the Heidelberg NBS Laboratory, Germany. We identified a significant sex difference, resulting in twice as many false-positives male than female newborns. Moreover, the proposed digital-tier strategy based on logistic regression analysis, ridge regression, and support vector machine reduced the false-positive rate by over 90% compared to regular NBS while identifying all confirmed individuals with GA1 correctly. An in-depth analysis of the profiles revealed that in particular false-positive results with high associated follow-up costs could be reduced significantly. In conclusion, understanding the origin of false-positive NBS and implementing a digital-tier strategy to enhance the specificity of GA1 testing may significantly reduce the burden on newborns and their families from false-positive NBS results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10040083
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital-Tier Strategy Improves Newborn Screening for Glutaric Aciduria Type 1

Saskia Haupt, Nikolas Boy, Julian Teinert, Elaine Zaunseder et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
0.38
article

Digital-Tier Strategy Improves Newborn Screening for Glutaric Aciduria Type 1

Saskia Haupt, Nikolas Boy, Julian Teinert, Elaine Zaunseder, Stefan Kölker, Ulrike Mütze, Vincent Heuveline, Sven F. Garbade, Georg F. Hoffmann, Patrik Feyh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1) is a rare inherited metabolic disease increasingly included in newborn screening (NBS) programs worldwide. Because of the broad biochemical spectrum of individuals with GA1 and the lack of reliable second-tier strategies, NBS for GA1 is still confronted with a high rate of false positives. In this study, we aim to increase the specificity of NBS for GA1 and, hence, to reduce the rate of false positives through machine learning methods. Therefore, we studied NBS profiles from 1,025,953 newborns screened between 2014 and 2023 at the Heidelberg NBS Laboratory, Germany. We identified a significant sex difference, resulting in twice as many false-positives male than female newborns. Moreover, the proposed digital-tier strategy based on logistic regression analysis, ridge regression, and support vector machine reduced the false-positive rate by over 90% compared to regular NBS while identifying all confirmed individuals with GA1 correctly. An in-depth analysis of the profiles revealed that in particular false-positive results with high associated follow-up costs could be reduced significantly. In conclusion, understanding the origin of false-positive NBS and implementing a digital-tier strategy to enhance the specificity of GA1 testing may significantly reduce the burden on newborns and their families from false-positive NBS results.

International Journal of Neonatal ScreeningVol. 10(4)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (DE)
Klaus Tschira Stiftung
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
0.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.