Weaving an alternative partnership: a collaborative autoethnography on ‘failing’ to research epistemic freedom

This collaborative autoethnography, written by two researchers, one from Italy and one from Chad, explores the possibilities of alternative pathways to development theory. Through the intersection of personal, emotional, professional and academic experiences, the paper identifies the opportunities and challenges conceptually and practically intertwined with understanding epistemic freedom in Africa. Consequently, it explores the material difficulties of building alternative partnerships while still practicing research in a precarious, neoliberal academic world. These challenges, which impede the attempts to reframe the experience of development and marginalise local knowledge, constitute forms of epistemic erasure. Therefore, resisting epistemic erasure also requires a visibilisation of these challenges related to the re-centring geographies of knowledge production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Third World Quarterly
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2024.2442565
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weaving an alternative partnership: a collaborative autoethnography on ‘failing’ to research epistemic freedom

Mariasole Pepa, Dobah Marsala Pamdandi
3 citations
Third World Quarterly
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
3.40
article

Weaving an alternative partnership: a collaborative autoethnography on ‘failing’ to research epistemic freedom

Mariasole Pepa, Dobah Marsala Pamdandi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This collaborative autoethnography, written by two researchers, one from Italy and one from Chad, explores the possibilities of alternative pathways to development theory. Through the intersection of personal, emotional, professional and academic experiences, the paper identifies the opportunities and challenges conceptually and practically intertwined with understanding epistemic freedom in Africa. Consequently, it explores the material difficulties of building alternative partnerships while still practicing research in a precarious, neoliberal academic world. These challenges, which impede the attempts to reframe the experience of development and marginalise local knowledge, constitute forms of epistemic erasure. Therefore, resisting epistemic erasure also requires a visibilisation of these challenges related to the re-centring geographies of knowledge production.

Third World QuarterlyVol. 46(14)
Université de Yaoundé I (CM), University of Padua (IT), Institut International des Assurances (CM)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.