Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–CuO Hybrid Nanofluids in Helically Micro-Finned Tubes Using Mass-Based and Discrete-Phase Models

This numerical study investigates forced convective heat transfer and pressure drop in turbulent hybrid nanofluid flow through a helically finned tube with constant wall temperature. Both single-phase mass-based model (MBM) and discrete-phase method (DPM) approaches are employed to analyze and compare heat transfer characteristics in a three-dimensional helically micro-finned geometry. This study evaluated the effects of various volume flow rates between 0.4 to 1.2 m 3 /h (Reynolds numbers between 11510 to 34530) and nanoparticle concentrations ranging from 0.5% to 3% on water-base Al 2 O 3 –CuO hybrid nanofluids’ thermal and flow characteristics obtained from studied approaches. Results demonstrate that the utilized single-phase MBM predicts higher values for both average heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop compared to values obtained from the discrete phase method (DPM). For a 3.0% hybrid nanofluid, with volumetric flow rates ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 m 3 /h, the mean absolute percentage deviation (MAPD) in the average heat transfer coefficient between the multiphase DPM and single-phase MBM approaches, relative to pure water, is 1.5% to 7.5%. Also, by increasing the hybrid nanoparticle concentration from 0 to 3%, the deviation between single-phase and multi-phase approaches increases, reaching a maximum of 5.7% for the average heat transfer coefficient at a volume flow rate of 0.8 m 3 /h. However, at lower nanoparticle concentrations, both single-phase and multi-phase models produce similar results with minimal differences. The main novelty of the present work is that it compares the single-phase mass-based model with multi-phase DPM approaches. In addition, the combination of these modeling methods with the specific geometry of the present problem, turbulent regime, and the present hybrid nanofluid, for the first time in this study is considered. As a result, the single-phase approach offers a simpler and more cost-effective alternative to the more complex multi-phase methods for predicting nanofluid behavior in dilute solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nanofluids
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1166/jon.2024.2199
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer of Al2O3–CuO Hybrid Nanofluids in Helically Micro-Finned Tubes Using Mass-Based and Discrete-Phase Models

Ammar Kazemi Jouybari, Saeed Dinarvand, Mohammad Eftekhari Yazdi, Pedram Tehrani et al.
3 citations
Journal of Nanofluids
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
0.55
article

Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer of Al2O3–CuO Hybrid Nanofluids in Helically Micro-Finned Tubes Using Mass-Based and Discrete-Phase Models

Ammar Kazemi Jouybari, Saeed Dinarvand, Mohammad Eftekhari Yazdi, Pedram Tehrani, Gholamreza Salehi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This numerical study investigates forced convective heat transfer and pressure drop in turbulent hybrid nanofluid flow through a helically finned tube with constant wall temperature. Both single-phase mass-based model (MBM) and discrete-phase method (DPM) approaches are employed to analyze and compare heat transfer characteristics in a three-dimensional helically micro-finned geometry. This study evaluated the effects of various volume flow rates between 0.4 to 1.2 m 3 /h (Reynolds numbers between 11510 to 34530) and nanoparticle concentrations ranging from 0.5% to 3% on water-base Al 2 O 3 –CuO hybrid nanofluids’ thermal and flow characteristics obtained from studied approaches. Results demonstrate that the utilized single-phase MBM predicts higher values for both average heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop compared to values obtained from the discrete phase method (DPM). For a 3.0% hybrid nanofluid, with volumetric flow rates ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 m 3 /h, the mean absolute percentage deviation (MAPD) in the average heat transfer coefficient between the multiphase DPM and single-phase MBM approaches, relative to pure water, is 1.5% to 7.5%. Also, by increasing the hybrid nanoparticle concentration from 0 to 3%, the deviation between single-phase and multi-phase approaches increases, reaching a maximum of 5.7% for the average heat transfer coefficient at a volume flow rate of 0.8 m 3 /h. However, at lower nanoparticle concentrations, both single-phase and multi-phase models produce similar results with minimal differences. The main novelty of the present work is that it compares the single-phase mass-based model with multi-phase DPM approaches. In addition, the combination of these modeling methods with the specific geometry of the present problem, turbulent regime, and the present hybrid nanofluid, for the first time in this study is considered. As a result, the single-phase approach offers a simpler and more cost-effective alternative to the more complex multi-phase methods for predicting nanofluid behavior in dilute solutions.

Journal of NanofluidsVol. 13(5)
Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.