Institutions and Economic Growth: A Panel Granger Causality Analysis

This paper revisits the direction of causality between institutions and economic growth for a sample of 119 countries over the period 1999-2018, divided into four groups according to income level: high income, upper middle income, lower middle income and low income. The study uses two institutional datasets, the International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) for the main estimation and the World Governance Indicators (WGI) for check the robustness of the results. Using the non-causality Granger test in a heterogeneous panel model with fixed coefficients, developed by Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012), the empirical results show a unidirectional relationship for all panels except for lower middle-income countries, where causality is bidirectional. The findings also suggest that causality patterns are heterogeneous and depend on the level of development of the countries. Based on these results, we propose some interesting recommendations. The types of reforms to prioritize must be determined according to the direction of causality between institutions and economic growth. Moreover, heterogeneous causality implies the implementation of different policies adapted to the level of development of each panel, rather than considering a common policy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Academic Journal of Economics and Business
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36348/gajeb.2024.v06i06.003
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutions and Economic Growth: A Panel Granger Causality Analysis

Ouiem Ouahhabi, Lahboub Zouiri
Global Academic Journal of Economics and Business
Economic Growth and Development
article

Institutions and Economic Growth: A Panel Granger Causality Analysis

Ouiem Ouahhabi, Lahboub Zouiri
article en

Abstract

This paper revisits the direction of causality between institutions and economic growth for a sample of 119 countries over the period 1999-2018, divided into four groups according to income level: high income, upper middle income, lower middle income and low income. The study uses two institutional datasets, the International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) for the main estimation and the World Governance Indicators (WGI) for check the robustness of the results. Using the non-causality Granger test in a heterogeneous panel model with fixed coefficients, developed by Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012), the empirical results show a unidirectional relationship for all panels except for lower middle-income countries, where causality is bidirectional. The findings also suggest that causality patterns are heterogeneous and depend on the level of development of the countries. Based on these results, we propose some interesting recommendations. The types of reforms to prioritize must be determined according to the direction of causality between institutions and economic growth. Moreover, heterogeneous causality implies the implementation of different policies adapted to the level of development of each panel, rather than considering a common policy.

Global Academic Journal of Economics and BusinessVol. 6(06)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Economic Growth and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutions and Economic Growth: A Panel Granger Causality Analysis — Ouiem Ouahhabi, Lahboub Zouiri · Global Academic Journal of Economics and Business (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS