Inverted Pendulum (IP) Based on Aquila Optimization FOPID Controller (AO-FOPIDC)

This paper aims to create a Fractional Order PID Controller (FOPIDC) employing Aquila Optimization (AO) to monitor the CP, CV, and AP of an IP in addition to erroneous arcs. By rebuilding the traditional PID employing the fractional order concept, this method alters the control execution. The AO-FOPIDC has become a revolutionary approach whose parameters alter animatedly in response to its error signal e(t). Evaluating how much AO-FOPIDC is being implemented more successfully or not involves comparing the corresponding results in addition to various control methods which are being used currently. The comparative findings made it abundantly evident that the recommended method of limiting the dynamics of the model has been carried out much more effectively in terms of accuracy, reliability, and resilience.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/odicon62106.2024.10797608
Primary Topic
Engineering and Technology Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inverted Pendulum (IP) Based on Aquila Optimization FOPID Controller (AO-FOPIDC)

Manoj Kumar Debnath, Girija Sankar Panigrahi, Akshaya Kumar Patra, Alok Kumar Mishra et al.
Engineering and Technology Innovations
article

Inverted Pendulum (IP) Based on Aquila Optimization FOPID Controller (AO-FOPIDC)

Manoj Kumar Debnath, Girija Sankar Panigrahi, Akshaya Kumar Patra, Alok Kumar Mishra, Narayan Nahak, Anuja Nanda
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to create a Fractional Order PID Controller (FOPIDC) employing Aquila Optimization (AO) to monitor the CP, CV, and AP of an IP in addition to erroneous arcs. By rebuilding the traditional PID employing the fractional order concept, this method alters the control execution. The AO-FOPIDC has become a revolutionary approach whose parameters alter animatedly in response to its error signal e(t). Evaluating how much AO-FOPIDC is being implemented more successfully or not involves comparing the corresponding results in addition to various control methods which are being used currently. The comparative findings made it abundantly evident that the recommended method of limiting the dynamics of the model has been carried out much more effectively in terms of accuracy, reliability, and resilience.

Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Engineering and Technology Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inverted Pendulum (IP) Based on Aquila Optimization FOPID Controller (AO-FOPIDC) — Manoj Kumar Debnath, Girija Sankar Panigrahi, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS