Deep Learning-based MRI Analysis for Brain Tumor Detection: Insights from ResNet and DenseNet Models

The diagnosis of brain tumor from MRI is a complex problem considered to be one of the most important aspects in medical diagnosis since timely detection along with correct categorization can considerably enhance patients’ prognosis. This paper aims at investigating the use of the two main deep learning architectures, namely ResNet and DenseNet, for brain tumor diagnosis. Specifically, these pre-trained models were used through transfer learning and fine-tuned on brain tumor MRI scans dataset to evaluate the performance metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. ResNet fixes the vanishing gradient problem that is inherent to deep learning and lets one train deeper models. DenseNet as a result of the dense connectivity between the layers; enhances feature reuse and gradient flow, it therefore makes better use of the parameters. The experimental results show that DenseNet achieved a higher validation accuracy of $95 \%$, while ResNet achieved $85 \%$ even with a seemingly more difficult distribution, with only $12 \%$ and $37 \%$, pointing to better generalization and stability of the receiving function. Model improving techniques included random rotations of images, flipping, and random changes in image color intensity. Precise learning rate management strategies such as learning rate scheduling helped to stabilize the training process, DenseNet among them. The confusion matrix analysis proceeding it further affirmed DenseNet’s performance in ‘No Tumor’ and ‘Tumor’ differentiation. In this objective comparison, DenseNet’s ability for better and accurate brain tumor detection when applied in a clinical environment has been postulated. Further works should consider incorporating tumor localization to the classification technique, investigate new network architectures further and, test such algorithms in authentic clinic setting to build a more efficient diagnostic tool to improve patients’ treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iceca63461.2024.10800894
Citations
23
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning-based MRI Analysis for Brain Tumor Detection: Insights from ResNet and DenseNet Models

S. Maheswari, S. Padmakala
23 citations
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
5.69
article

Deep Learning-based MRI Analysis for Brain Tumor Detection: Insights from ResNet and DenseNet Models

S. Maheswari, S. Padmakala
article en
23 citations

Abstract

The diagnosis of brain tumor from MRI is a complex problem considered to be one of the most important aspects in medical diagnosis since timely detection along with correct categorization can considerably enhance patients’ prognosis. This paper aims at investigating the use of the two main deep learning architectures, namely ResNet and DenseNet, for brain tumor diagnosis. Specifically, these pre-trained models were used through transfer learning and fine-tuned on brain tumor MRI scans dataset to evaluate the performance metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. ResNet fixes the vanishing gradient problem that is inherent to deep learning and lets one train deeper models. DenseNet as a result of the dense connectivity between the layers; enhances feature reuse and gradient flow, it therefore makes better use of the parameters. The experimental results show that DenseNet achieved a higher validation accuracy of $95 \%$, while ResNet achieved $85 \%$ even with a seemingly more difficult distribution, with only $12 \%$ and $37 \%$, pointing to better generalization and stability of the receiving function. Model improving techniques included random rotations of images, flipping, and random changes in image color intensity. Precise learning rate management strategies such as learning rate scheduling helped to stabilize the training process, DenseNet among them. The confusion matrix analysis proceeding it further affirmed DenseNet’s performance in ‘No Tumor’ and ‘Tumor’ differentiation. In this objective comparison, DenseNet’s ability for better and accurate brain tumor detection when applied in a clinical environment has been postulated. Further works should consider incorporating tumor localization to the classification technique, investigate new network architectures further and, test such algorithms in authentic clinic setting to build a more efficient diagnostic tool to improve patients’ treatment.

Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
5.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.