A Comparative Analysis Between Quantum Machine Learning and Machine Learning on EEG Dataset

In recent years, quantum technology has been developing in several fields, including quantum computing. Quantum Computing (QC) is a type of computing that uses quantum bits (qubits) instead of classical bits to perform calculations. Unlike classical computers, which use binary logic (0s and 1s), quantum computers exploit quantum phenomena (such as superposition and entanglement), which are expected to bring advantages over traditional Machine Learning (ML). However, QC is still an emerging field, and further research is needed to fully understand its potential in ML. In this regard, for example, it is still unclear how QC compares with traditional ML in terms of stability and generalization. Starting from this consideration, this work intends to experimentally compare quantum and traditional ML. In particular, the classical Support Vector Machine (SVM), which belongs to the traditional ML approach, and a Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM), as Quantum Machine Learning (QML) approach (which combines quantum computing and machine learning through quantum properties), are applied to a specific case study related to electroencephalographic (EEG) data. The comparison was conducted on similar development environments to ensure comparable results from a measurement standpoint. The results highlight that there are some critical points involving the generalization ability of QML algorithms, possibly related to an appropriate and specific hyperparameter search.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/metroxraine62247.2024.10796999
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis Between Quantum Machine Learning and Machine Learning on EEG Dataset

Annarita Tedesco, Egidio De Benedetto, Leopoldo Angrisani, Alessandro Di Bernardo et al.
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

A Comparative Analysis Between Quantum Machine Learning and Machine Learning on EEG Dataset

Annarita Tedesco, Egidio De Benedetto, Leopoldo Angrisani, Alessandro Di Bernardo, Roberto Prevete
article en

Abstract

In recent years, quantum technology has been developing in several fields, including quantum computing. Quantum Computing (QC) is a type of computing that uses quantum bits (qubits) instead of classical bits to perform calculations. Unlike classical computers, which use binary logic (0s and 1s), quantum computers exploit quantum phenomena (such as superposition and entanglement), which are expected to bring advantages over traditional Machine Learning (ML). However, QC is still an emerging field, and further research is needed to fully understand its potential in ML. In this regard, for example, it is still unclear how QC compares with traditional ML in terms of stability and generalization. Starting from this consideration, this work intends to experimentally compare quantum and traditional ML. In particular, the classical Support Vector Machine (SVM), which belongs to the traditional ML approach, and a Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM), as Quantum Machine Learning (QML) approach (which combines quantum computing and machine learning through quantum properties), are applied to a specific case study related to electroencephalographic (EEG) data. The comparison was conducted on similar development environments to ensure comparable results from a measurement standpoint. The results highlight that there are some critical points involving the generalization ability of QML algorithms, possibly related to an appropriate and specific hyperparameter search.

University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.