Introspection about forced and free choice: Accurate subjective time estimation for externally as well as self-determined actions

Free-choice behavior is unique in that actions are internally self-determined, unlike forced-choice behavior, which is externally specified. Several studies suggest these two action modes can lead to different behavioral, affective, and motivational outcomes. We examined whether people estimate free-choice differently from forced-choice processing time due to possible introspective biases associated with these modes. Consistent with previous studies, free choices were slower than forced choices and action mode interacted with perceptual difficulty. Importantly, all effects in mean reaction times (RTs) were mirrored in mean introspective RTs (iRTs). Moreover, objective RTs alone could essentially predict iRTs without any contributing distortion of choice modes. Thus, introspection about RT appears equally accurate for both externally and self-determined actions, suggesting that iRTs are primarily based on a direct read-out of temporal information. Possibly, accurate introspection about processing time is a crucial basis for potentially distinct subjective experiences of free and forced choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consciousness and Cognition
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2024.103804
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introspection about forced and free choice: Accurate subjective time estimation for externally as well as self-determined actions

Hartmut Leuthold, Daniel Bratzke, Ian Grant Mackenzie, Victor Mittelstädt
1 citations
Consciousness and Cognition
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
0.54
article

Introspection about forced and free choice: Accurate subjective time estimation for externally as well as self-determined actions

Hartmut Leuthold, Daniel Bratzke, Ian Grant Mackenzie, Victor Mittelstädt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Free-choice behavior is unique in that actions are internally self-determined, unlike forced-choice behavior, which is externally specified. Several studies suggest these two action modes can lead to different behavioral, affective, and motivational outcomes. We examined whether people estimate free-choice differently from forced-choice processing time due to possible introspective biases associated with these modes. Consistent with previous studies, free choices were slower than forced choices and action mode interacted with perceptual difficulty. Importantly, all effects in mean reaction times (RTs) were mirrored in mean introspective RTs (iRTs). Moreover, objective RTs alone could essentially predict iRTs without any contributing distortion of choice modes. Thus, introspection about RT appears equally accurate for both externally and self-determined actions, suggesting that iRTs are primarily based on a direct read-out of temporal information. Possibly, accurate introspection about processing time is a crucial basis for potentially distinct subjective experiences of free and forced choices.

Consciousness and CognitionVol. 127
University of Bremen (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Introspection about forced and free choice: Accurate subjective time estimation for externally as well as self-determined actions — Hartmut Leuthold, Daniel Bratzke, et al. · Consciousness and Cognition (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS