Queer refugees and human rights: on the limits of recognition

Abstract This article draws from the author’s lived experience of queer displacement and involvement in international advocacy for LGBTIQ+ refugees, focusing on key policy developments from 2016 to 2021. Central to this analysis is the Global Compact on Refugees (GCR), which, despite its potential, ultimately failed to specifically address the needs of LGBTIQ+ refugees. Through a lived-experience lens, the GCR’s text is critically examined, revealing its limitations in recognizing LGBTIQ+ refugees. Further analysis of UNHCR’s Global Roundtable on Protection and Solutions for LGBTIQ+ People in Forced Displacement exposes the power imbalances that hinder meaningful participation in spaces purportedly inclusive of LGBTIQ+ refugees. The author contends that mere visibility is insufficient for recognition; a redistribution of power is essential. Grounded in feminist and intersectional frameworks, the article advocates for a paradigm shift in refugee policy towards full inclusion, human rights protection, justice and social equity for LGBTIQ+ refugees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Refugee Studies
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feae088
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Queer refugees and human rights: on the limits of recognition

Tina Nina Dixson
1 citations
Journal of Refugee Studies
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
1.13
article

Queer refugees and human rights: on the limits of recognition

Tina Nina Dixson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article draws from the author’s lived experience of queer displacement and involvement in international advocacy for LGBTIQ+ refugees, focusing on key policy developments from 2016 to 2021. Central to this analysis is the Global Compact on Refugees (GCR), which, despite its potential, ultimately failed to specifically address the needs of LGBTIQ+ refugees. Through a lived-experience lens, the GCR’s text is critically examined, revealing its limitations in recognizing LGBTIQ+ refugees. Further analysis of UNHCR’s Global Roundtable on Protection and Solutions for LGBTIQ+ People in Forced Displacement exposes the power imbalances that hinder meaningful participation in spaces purportedly inclusive of LGBTIQ+ refugees. The author contends that mere visibility is insufficient for recognition; a redistribution of power is essential. Grounded in feminist and intersectional frameworks, the article advocates for a paradigm shift in refugee policy towards full inclusion, human rights protection, justice and social equity for LGBTIQ+ refugees.

Journal of Refugee Studies
Australian National University (AU), New Generation University College (ET), National University College (PR)
Australian Government
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Queer refugees and human rights: on the limits of recognition — Tina Nina Dixson · Journal of Refugee Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS