Hybrid near and far field electrospinning of PVDF-TrFE/BaTiO<sub>3</sub> scaffolds: morphology and osteoblast-like cell responses

Scaffolds are of great interest in tissue engineering associated with regenerative medicine owing to their ability to mimic biological structures and provide support for new tissue formation. Several techniques are used to produce biological scaffolds; among them, far-field electrospinning (FFES) process is widely used due to its versatility in producing promising structures similar to native tissues owing to the electrospun nanofibers. On the other hand, near-field electrospinning (NFES) has been investigated due to the possibility of creating scaffolds with suitable architecture for their use in specific biological tissues. Thus, we investigated the potential of the electrospun scaffolds prepared using both techniques FFES and NFES, with tailored properties to mimic bone tissue native matrix and enhance the cell response. We produced scaffolds with the piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) combined with BaTiO<sub>3</sub>nanoparticles. Hence, the properties of both scaffolds were evaluated in terms of crystallinity and cell behavior, such as adhesion, proliferation and cell viability. Microstructure properties showed good thermal stability, similar crystallinity (∼65%) and a<i>β</i>-phase content of ∼40% for both scaffolds. For biological tests, MG-63 osteoblast-like cells were used, and for NFES scaffolds, we noted that the proliferation and cell alignment followed the fiber pattern and created a bridge between adjacent fibers. In contrast, cells spread and proliferated randomly on the surface of the FFES scaffold. Despite the differences in cell behavior, both scaffolds showed good biocompatibility in terms of functional scaffolds with suitable characteristics for use in the area of tissue regeneration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Materials
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ada2cf
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid near and far field electrospinning of PVDF-TrFE/BaTiO3 scaffolds: morphology and osteoblast-like cell responses

Krzysztof Berniak, Rossano Gimenes, Sunija Sukumaran, Urszula Stachewicz et al.
4 citations
Biomedical Materials
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
0.69
article

Hybrid near and far field electrospinning of PVDF-TrFE/BaTiO3 scaffolds: morphology and osteoblast-like cell responses

Krzysztof Berniak, Rossano Gimenes, Sunija Sukumaran, Urszula Stachewicz, Larissa Mayra Silva Ribeiro
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Scaffolds are of great interest in tissue engineering associated with regenerative medicine owing to their ability to mimic biological structures and provide support for new tissue formation. Several techniques are used to produce biological scaffolds; among them, far-field electrospinning (FFES) process is widely used due to its versatility in producing promising structures similar to native tissues owing to the electrospun nanofibers. On the other hand, near-field electrospinning (NFES) has been investigated due to the possibility of creating scaffolds with suitable architecture for their use in specific biological tissues. Thus, we investigated the potential of the electrospun scaffolds prepared using both techniques FFES and NFES, with tailored properties to mimic bone tissue native matrix and enhance the cell response. We produced scaffolds with the piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) combined with BaTiO<sub>3</sub>nanoparticles. Hence, the properties of both scaffolds were evaluated in terms of crystallinity and cell behavior, such as adhesion, proliferation and cell viability. Microstructure properties showed good thermal stability, similar crystallinity (∼65%) and a<i>β</i>-phase content of ∼40% for both scaffolds. For biological tests, MG-63 osteoblast-like cells were used, and for NFES scaffolds, we noted that the proliferation and cell alignment followed the fiber pattern and created a bridge between adjacent fibers. In contrast, cells spread and proliferated randomly on the surface of the FFES scaffold. Despite the differences in cell behavior, both scaffolds showed good biocompatibility in terms of functional scaffolds with suitable characteristics for use in the area of tissue regeneration.

Biomedical MaterialsVol. 20(1)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Krakow University of Economics (PL), Cracow University of Technology (PL), Centro de Tecnologia da Informação Renato Archer (BR), AGH University of Krakow (PL), Universidade Federal de Itajubá (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Narodowe Centrum Nauki, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.