“The Body of Christ Is Disabled Without the Presence of People with Disability”: A Re-Evaluation

The statement, “the body of Christ is disabled without the presence of people with disability” is one that makes regular appearances in works of disability theologians and practitioners. The pithy aphorism is meant to serve as a prompt to remind church communities that they need to be places where people with disability can be active and contributing members. However, upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that the statement is problematic and, as a result, ends up perpetuating the notion that disability is undesirable and to be avoided. This article outlines two primary objections to the use of the phrase and offers in its place an alternative way of understanding the place of people with disability both in the body of Christ and in our church communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theological Reflections Eastern European Journal of Theology
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2024.22.2.3
Primary Topic
Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The Body of Christ Is Disabled Without the Presence of People with Disability”: A Re-Evaluation

Louise Gosbell
Theological Reflections Eastern European Journal of Theology
Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
article

“The Body of Christ Is Disabled Without the Presence of People with Disability”: A Re-Evaluation

Louise Gosbell
article en

Abstract

The statement, “the body of Christ is disabled without the presence of people with disability” is one that makes regular appearances in works of disability theologians and practitioners. The pithy aphorism is meant to serve as a prompt to remind church communities that they need to be places where people with disability can be active and contributing members. However, upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that the statement is problematic and, as a result, ends up perpetuating the notion that disability is undesirable and to be avoided. This article outlines two primary objections to the use of the phrase and offers in its place an alternative way of understanding the place of people with disability both in the body of Christ and in our church communities.

Theological Reflections Eastern European Journal of TheologyVol. 22(2)
Australian University of Theology (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.