The potential of Sentinel-1 imagery for flood event detection: A satellite vs. hydraulic model comparison

• Encourages the use of Sentinel-1 (S1) data in hydraulic modelling (HM). • S1 imagery provides flood extent data for the HM at a specific time. • S1 provides an additional source of data that cannot be measured on-site. • S1 can be used in areas where HM will not be implemented. • Supports integration of different disciplines in flood risk management. Comparing flooded area detection between the hydraulic modelling and Sentinel-1 radar imagery processed by Automatic Detection of Water Bodies (Sentinel-1 ADWB) confirmed that SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) imagery shows good potential for improving flood studies. The study was performed in a study area of the Krka River floodplain (Slovenia). The focus was to analyse the overlapping areas between the Sentinel-1 ADWB and numerical hydraulic modelling and to recognise the factors that play a role in the differences between those areas. At the same time, the study also demonstrated the applicability of Sentinel-1 ADWB. The overlapping between the two data sources was up to 66%. The most significant differences between the data were in areas simulated by the hydraulic modelling but not detected by satellite imagery processed by Sentinel-1 ADWB. These were mainly areas with dense vegetation, such as forests, where the satellite (as expected) had difficulty detecting floods, and detection borders, where detection was difficult due to lower water depths and/or detection limitations due to spatial resolution or region growing process. Areas less well modelled by the hydraulic model than satellite imagery were also identified, indicating regions where Sentinel-1 ADWB can improve flood studies as additional data for hydraulic simulation. The study shows that users need to understand the drawbacks and advantages of modes for obtaining the data – radar satellite imagery (problems under dense vegetation, spatial resolution, etc.) and hydraulic model (lack of quality input data, the precipitation directly above the studied area, water inflow from the hinterland, etc.). Based on the knowledge of the areas where Sentinel-1 ADWB data can be useful, the data’s potential for calibration and verification processes of hydraulic studies is suggested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132587
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The potential of Sentinel-1 imagery for flood event detection: A satellite vs. hydraulic model comparison

Gašper Rak, Jana Breznik, Krištof Oštir
6 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.70
article

The potential of Sentinel-1 imagery for flood event detection: A satellite vs. hydraulic model comparison

Gašper Rak, Jana Breznik, Krištof Oštir
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• Encourages the use of Sentinel-1 (S1) data in hydraulic modelling (HM). • S1 imagery provides flood extent data for the HM at a specific time. • S1 provides an additional source of data that cannot be measured on-site. • S1 can be used in areas where HM will not be implemented. • Supports integration of different disciplines in flood risk management. Comparing flooded area detection between the hydraulic modelling and Sentinel-1 radar imagery processed by Automatic Detection of Water Bodies (Sentinel-1 ADWB) confirmed that SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) imagery shows good potential for improving flood studies. The study was performed in a study area of the Krka River floodplain (Slovenia). The focus was to analyse the overlapping areas between the Sentinel-1 ADWB and numerical hydraulic modelling and to recognise the factors that play a role in the differences between those areas. At the same time, the study also demonstrated the applicability of Sentinel-1 ADWB. The overlapping between the two data sources was up to 66%. The most significant differences between the data were in areas simulated by the hydraulic modelling but not detected by satellite imagery processed by Sentinel-1 ADWB. These were mainly areas with dense vegetation, such as forests, where the satellite (as expected) had difficulty detecting floods, and detection borders, where detection was difficult due to lower water depths and/or detection limitations due to spatial resolution or region growing process. Areas less well modelled by the hydraulic model than satellite imagery were also identified, indicating regions where Sentinel-1 ADWB can improve flood studies as additional data for hydraulic simulation. The study shows that users need to understand the drawbacks and advantages of modes for obtaining the data – radar satellite imagery (problems under dense vegetation, spatial resolution, etc.) and hydraulic model (lack of quality input data, the precipitation directly above the studied area, water inflow from the hinterland, etc.). Based on the knowledge of the areas where Sentinel-1 ADWB data can be useful, the data’s potential for calibration and verification processes of hydraulic studies is suggested.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 651
University of Ljubljana (SI), Geodetic Institute of Slovenia (SI)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.