Large-scale analysis of online social data on the long-term sentiment and content dynamics of online (mis)information

The widespread dissemination of online misinformation poses a significant threat to both our information ecosystem and the decision-making processes of individuals and societies. While prior research has extensively examined the static characteristics of misinformation, its long-term evolution remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by analyzing a dataset from Twitter (now “X”) comprising approximately two million tweets related to 366 fact-checked stories. Consistent with existing research, misinformation carried more negative emotions, particularly disgust and anger, compared to true information, while positive emotions were notably suppressed. Importantly, over time, misinformation became increasingly negative, a trend that was not observed for true information. Furthermore, we found a decreasing trend in positive emotions for misinformation, which was not mirrored in true information. These temporal sentiment dynamics were not attributable to differing content dynamics, as there was no evidence that the dominant narratives of false and true stories evolved differently. These findings underscore the importance of studying the temporal dynamics of online (mis)information; however, as our data was limited to fact-checked stories, it may not fully represent all information shared online. Nevertheless, these findings can (i) aid the efforts of politicians, journalists, social media providers, and the public in fostering a resilient information ecosystem, and (ii) inspire further research into areas such as the influence of source credibility, cross-platform generalizability, and underlying psychological mechanisms. • Study analyzed ∼ 2 million tweets covering 366 stories to track sentiment changes. • Online misinformation carries stronger negative emotions than true information. • Misinformation grows increasingly negative over time; true information stays stable. • Studying temporal dynamics is vital for fostering a resilient information ecosystem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108546
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large-scale analysis of online social data on the long-term sentiment and content dynamics of online (mis)information

Julian Kauk, Helene Kreysa, Stefan R. Schweinberger, Edda Humprecht
8 citations
Computers in Human Behavior
Misinformation and Its Impacts
9.06
article

Large-scale analysis of online social data on the long-term sentiment and content dynamics of online (mis)information

Julian Kauk, Helene Kreysa, Stefan R. Schweinberger, Edda Humprecht
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The widespread dissemination of online misinformation poses a significant threat to both our information ecosystem and the decision-making processes of individuals and societies. While prior research has extensively examined the static characteristics of misinformation, its long-term evolution remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by analyzing a dataset from Twitter (now “X”) comprising approximately two million tweets related to 366 fact-checked stories. Consistent with existing research, misinformation carried more negative emotions, particularly disgust and anger, compared to true information, while positive emotions were notably suppressed. Importantly, over time, misinformation became increasingly negative, a trend that was not observed for true information. Furthermore, we found a decreasing trend in positive emotions for misinformation, which was not mirrored in true information. These temporal sentiment dynamics were not attributable to differing content dynamics, as there was no evidence that the dominant narratives of false and true stories evolved differently. These findings underscore the importance of studying the temporal dynamics of online (mis)information; however, as our data was limited to fact-checked stories, it may not fully represent all information shared online. Nevertheless, these findings can (i) aid the efforts of politicians, journalists, social media providers, and the public in fostering a resilient information ecosystem, and (ii) inspire further research into areas such as the influence of source credibility, cross-platform generalizability, and underlying psychological mechanisms. • Study analyzed ∼ 2 million tweets covering 366 stories to track sentiment changes. • Online misinformation carries stronger negative emotions than true information. • Misinformation grows increasingly negative over time; true information stays stable. • Studying temporal dynamics is vital for fostering a resilient information ecosystem.

Computers in Human BehaviorVol. 165
Ernst Abbe University of Applied Sciences Jena (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
9.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.