Distinct transcriptional changes distinguish efficient and poor remyelination in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly heterogeneous disease, with varying remyelination potential across individuals and between lesions. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the potential to remyelinate remain poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to take advantage of the intrinsic heterogeneity in remyelinating capacity between MS donors and lesions to uncover known and novel pro-remyelinating molecules for MS therapies. To elucidate distinct molecular signatures underlying the potential to remyelinate, we stratified MS donors from the Netherlands Brain Bank cohort (n = 239), based on proportions of remyelinated lesions (RLs), into efficiently remyelinating donors (ERDs; n = 21) and poorly remyelinating donors (PRDs; n = 19). We performed bulk RNA sequencing of RLs, active lesions with ramified and amoeboid microglia/macrophage morphology (ALs non-foamy), active lesions with foamy microglia/macrophage morphology (ALs foamy) and normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) from ERDs and PRDs. We found that ALs non-foamy were positively correlated with remyelination, whereas ALs foamy were not, indicating a role for microglia/macrophage state in influencing remyelination potential. Bioinformatics analyses were performed to identify key pathways and molecules implicated in the remyelination process. We found distinct differences between the donors with differing remyelination potential in comparable MS lesion types. The RLs and ALs non-foamy of ERDs versus PRDs showed upregulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathway, whereas in ALs foamy of PRDs, inflammation and damage-associated pathways (i.e. MTORC1 signalling, TNF signalling and oxidative phosphorylation) were upregulated in comparison to ALs foamy of ERDs, suggesting that these latter pathways might counteract remyelination. We found genes significantly upregulated in RLs and/or ALs non-foamy of ERDs that have previously been associated with remyelination, including CXCL12, EGF, HGF, IGF2, IL10, PDGFB, PPARG and TREM2, illustrating the strength of our donor and lesion stratification. TGFB1, TGFB2, EGF and IGF1 were determined to be key upstream regulators of genes upregulated in RLs and ALs non-foamy of ERDs. We also identified potential novel pro-remyelinating molecules, such as BTC, GDF10, GDF15, CCN1, CCN4, FGF5, FGF10 and INHBB. Our study identified both known and novel genes associated with efficient remyelination that might facilitate the development of therapeutic strategies to promote tissue repair and clinical recovery in MS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae414
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct transcriptional changes distinguish efficient and poor remyelination in multiple sclerosis

Aldo Jongejan, Inge Huitinga, Dennis Wever, Joost Verhaagen et al.
9 citations
Brain
Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
2.23
article

Distinct transcriptional changes distinguish efficient and poor remyelination in multiple sclerosis

Aldo Jongejan, Inge Huitinga, Dennis Wever, Joost Verhaagen, Perry D. Moerland, Niamh B. McNamara, Fred de Winter, Joost Smolders, Jörg Hamann, Hendrik J. Engelenburg, J.Q. Alida Chen, Paul J H Nijhuis, Kaya Hopman, Esmée van Rixel
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly heterogeneous disease, with varying remyelination potential across individuals and between lesions. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the potential to remyelinate remain poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to take advantage of the intrinsic heterogeneity in remyelinating capacity between MS donors and lesions to uncover known and novel pro-remyelinating molecules for MS therapies. To elucidate distinct molecular signatures underlying the potential to remyelinate, we stratified MS donors from the Netherlands Brain Bank cohort (n = 239), based on proportions of remyelinated lesions (RLs), into efficiently remyelinating donors (ERDs; n = 21) and poorly remyelinating donors (PRDs; n = 19). We performed bulk RNA sequencing of RLs, active lesions with ramified and amoeboid microglia/macrophage morphology (ALs non-foamy), active lesions with foamy microglia/macrophage morphology (ALs foamy) and normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) from ERDs and PRDs. We found that ALs non-foamy were positively correlated with remyelination, whereas ALs foamy were not, indicating a role for microglia/macrophage state in influencing remyelination potential. Bioinformatics analyses were performed to identify key pathways and molecules implicated in the remyelination process. We found distinct differences between the donors with differing remyelination potential in comparable MS lesion types. The RLs and ALs non-foamy of ERDs versus PRDs showed upregulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathway, whereas in ALs foamy of PRDs, inflammation and damage-associated pathways (i.e. MTORC1 signalling, TNF signalling and oxidative phosphorylation) were upregulated in comparison to ALs foamy of ERDs, suggesting that these latter pathways might counteract remyelination. We found genes significantly upregulated in RLs and/or ALs non-foamy of ERDs that have previously been associated with remyelination, including CXCL12, EGF, HGF, IGF2, IL10, PDGFB, PPARG and TREM2, illustrating the strength of our donor and lesion stratification. TGFB1, TGFB2, EGF and IGF1 were determined to be key upstream regulators of genes upregulated in RLs and ALs non-foamy of ERDs. We also identified potential novel pro-remyelinating molecules, such as BTC, GDF10, GDF15, CCN1, CCN4, FGF5, FGF10 and INHBB. Our study identified both known and novel genes associated with efficient remyelination that might facilitate the development of therapeutic strategies to promote tissue repair and clinical recovery in MS.

BrainVol. 148(6)
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.