Presentation and Analysis of the Online Evidence Gap Map, “Clinical Effectiveness of Homeopathy”

This study presents and analyzes the content of an online Evidence Gap Map (EGM), "<i>Clinical Effectiveness of Homeopathy, 1st Edition</i>", which graphically represents evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) of human clinical trials in homeopathy that were published from 1991 to 2021. The EGM was built according to the guidelines of the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), adapted for complex interventions, to represent visually relevant evidence and research gaps.The interventions, classified as rows, are characterized in the EGM not only by the homeopathic therapeutic strategy but also by individual medicines and potencies. The outcomes are listed in columns. The associations between both are represented by "bubbles" that refer to the corresponding SRs and whose colors indicate their quality level.From 239 citations identified, 51 SRs underwent complete characterization for the final construction of the EGM. A further in-depth quality analysis of each SR was performed to list the studied intervention/outcome associations described in each mentioned trial. At this step, those trials considered to have a high risk of bias by the authors of each SR were excluded from the EGM inputs.The methodological quality of each of the EGM's SRs was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 criteria for level of confidence in an SR's results. Intervention-outcome associations were categorized into one of five effects of a homeopathic intervention: <i>positive</i>, <i>potentially positive</i>, <i>ineffective</i>, <i>inconclusive</i>, or <i>negative</i>.The EGM presents research evidence across a wide range of medical conditions, with substantial heterogeneity of homeopathic interventions and clinical outcomes. Forty-two of the 51 SRs yielded inconclusive findings. AMSTAR-2 analysis identified seven high-quality SRs, in which reliable primary studies presenting positive or potentially positive results for different categories of homeopathy are cited and related to specific clinical conditions: fibromyalgia, otitis media, diarrhea, respiratory infections, menopausal syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children.The EGM "<i>Clinical Effectiveness of Homeopathy, 1st Edition</i>" presents visually relevant research evidence that is scattered across a large number of medical conditions, showing substantial heterogeneity of homeopathic interventions, clinical outcomes, and research quality. To enhance the precision and relevance of future research, we recommend that the individualized homeopathic approach under investigation be standardized to the greatest extent feasible, and to use measures of well-being and quality of life as primary outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Homeopathy
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791490
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Presentation and Analysis of the Online Evidence Gap Map, “Clinical Effectiveness of Homeopathy”

Carmen Verônica Mendes Abdala, C Portella, Mariana Cabral Schveitzer, Carla Holandino et al.
3 citations
Homeopathy
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
2.15
article

Presentation and Analysis of the Online Evidence Gap Map, “Clinical Effectiveness of Homeopathy”

Carmen Verônica Mendes Abdala, C Portella, Mariana Cabral Schveitzer, Carla Holandino, Jorge Kioshi Hosomi, Ricardo Ghelman, Leoni Villano Bonamin, Ednar Nascimento Coimbra, U. Adler, Edgard Costa de Vilhena, Adriana Passos Oliveira
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study presents and analyzes the content of an online Evidence Gap Map (EGM), "<i>Clinical Effectiveness of Homeopathy, 1st Edition</i>", which graphically represents evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) of human clinical trials in homeopathy that were published from 1991 to 2021. The EGM was built according to the guidelines of the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), adapted for complex interventions, to represent visually relevant evidence and research gaps.The interventions, classified as rows, are characterized in the EGM not only by the homeopathic therapeutic strategy but also by individual medicines and potencies. The outcomes are listed in columns. The associations between both are represented by "bubbles" that refer to the corresponding SRs and whose colors indicate their quality level.From 239 citations identified, 51 SRs underwent complete characterization for the final construction of the EGM. A further in-depth quality analysis of each SR was performed to list the studied intervention/outcome associations described in each mentioned trial. At this step, those trials considered to have a high risk of bias by the authors of each SR were excluded from the EGM inputs.The methodological quality of each of the EGM's SRs was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 criteria for level of confidence in an SR's results. Intervention-outcome associations were categorized into one of five effects of a homeopathic intervention: <i>positive</i>, <i>potentially positive</i>, <i>ineffective</i>, <i>inconclusive</i>, or <i>negative</i>.The EGM presents research evidence across a wide range of medical conditions, with substantial heterogeneity of homeopathic interventions and clinical outcomes. Forty-two of the 51 SRs yielded inconclusive findings. AMSTAR-2 analysis identified seven high-quality SRs, in which reliable primary studies presenting positive or potentially positive results for different categories of homeopathy are cited and related to specific clinical conditions: fibromyalgia, otitis media, diarrhea, respiratory infections, menopausal syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children.The EGM "<i>Clinical Effectiveness of Homeopathy, 1st Edition</i>" presents visually relevant research evidence that is scattered across a large number of medical conditions, showing substantial heterogeneity of homeopathic interventions, clinical outcomes, and research quality. To enhance the precision and relevance of future research, we recommend that the individualized homeopathic approach under investigation be standardized to the greatest extent feasible, and to use measures of well-being and quality of life as primary outcomes.

HomeopathyVol. 114(04)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade Paulista (BR), Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde (BR), Universidade de Santo Amaro (BR), Universidade Federal de Alagoas (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
2.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.