The Effects of ChatGPT-Generated Feedback on Saudi EFL Learners’ Writing Skills and Perception at the Tertiary Level: A Mixed-Methods Study

Corrective feedback plays a critical role in enhancing writing skills among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, but large class sizes often hinder the provision of personalized feedback. Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT have emerged as promising solutions that offer immediate and individualized feedback for writing. This study examined the effects of ChatGPT-generated feedback in comparison to teacher-generated feedback on Saudi EFL students’ writing skills and perception at the university level. A mixed-method approach was employed to ensure comprehensive data collection and analyses. Using the pretest-posttest control group design, 102 participants were assigned to an experimental group, which received ChatGPT-generated feedback, and a control group, which received teacher-generated feedback. Pretests, posttests, and a perception survey were used to collect the data. ANCOVA, with pretest scores as a covariate, and content analysis of perception data were conducted. The results indicated no statistically significant differences in posttest scores between the experimental group and the control group, suggesting that ChatGPT-generated feedback was as effective as teacher-generated feedback. The perception survey revealed an overall positive attitude toward the use of ChatGPT for academic writing. The study provides empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of generative AI tools in academic writing contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241307297
Citations
30
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of ChatGPT-Generated Feedback on Saudi EFL Learners’ Writing Skills and Perception at the Tertiary Level: A Mixed-Methods Study

Abrar H. Alsofyani, Amal M. Barzanji
30 citations
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.61
article

The Effects of ChatGPT-Generated Feedback on Saudi EFL Learners’ Writing Skills and Perception at the Tertiary Level: A Mixed-Methods Study

Abrar H. Alsofyani, Amal M. Barzanji
article en
30 citations

Abstract

Corrective feedback plays a critical role in enhancing writing skills among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, but large class sizes often hinder the provision of personalized feedback. Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT have emerged as promising solutions that offer immediate and individualized feedback for writing. This study examined the effects of ChatGPT-generated feedback in comparison to teacher-generated feedback on Saudi EFL students’ writing skills and perception at the university level. A mixed-method approach was employed to ensure comprehensive data collection and analyses. Using the pretest-posttest control group design, 102 participants were assigned to an experimental group, which received ChatGPT-generated feedback, and a control group, which received teacher-generated feedback. Pretests, posttests, and a perception survey were used to collect the data. ANCOVA, with pretest scores as a covariate, and content analysis of perception data were conducted. The results indicated no statistically significant differences in posttest scores between the experimental group and the control group, suggesting that ChatGPT-generated feedback was as effective as teacher-generated feedback. The perception survey revealed an overall positive attitude toward the use of ChatGPT for academic writing. The study provides empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of generative AI tools in academic writing contexts.

Journal of Educational Computing ResearchVol. 63(2)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), Taibah University (SA), Age Institute (FI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.