Conversion of cropland monoculture to agroforestry increases methane uptake

Abstract In temperate Europe, agroforestry practice is gaining interest due to its potential to enhance carbon (C) sequestration and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture. To date, the effects of agroforestry on the spatial and temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ) fluxes are still poorly quantified. Here we present a systematic comparison of soil CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes between agroforestry and monoculture cropland systems for the first time, based on two-year field measurements at three sites on different soils in Germany. Each site had an adjacent alley cropping agroforestry system and monoculture, and the agroforestry was established on former monoculture croplands 1 to 11 years prior to this study. We found that area-weighted soil CO 2 emissions from agroforestry (3.5−8.1 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 ) were comparable to monocultures (3.4−9.8 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 ), whereas area-weighted agroforestry generally had higher soil CH 4 uptake (0.4−1.3 kg C ha −1 yr −1 ) compared to monocultures (0.1−1.2 kg C ha −1 yr −1 ). Seasonal variations of soil CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes were strongly regulated by soil temperature and moisture, and the spatial variations were influenced by soil texture. Our results suggest that conversion of monoculture cropland to long-term alley cropping agroforestry system could be considered as a sustainable agriculture practice for its great potential for mitigating CH 4 emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00997-x
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conversion of cropland monoculture to agroforestry increases methane uptake

Guntars O. Martinson, Guodong Shao, Jie Luo, Marife D. Corre et al.
4 citations
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.33
article

Conversion of cropland monoculture to agroforestry increases methane uptake

Guntars O. Martinson, Guodong Shao, Jie Luo, Marife D. Corre, Edzo Veldkamp, Dan Niu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In temperate Europe, agroforestry practice is gaining interest due to its potential to enhance carbon (C) sequestration and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture. To date, the effects of agroforestry on the spatial and temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ) fluxes are still poorly quantified. Here we present a systematic comparison of soil CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes between agroforestry and monoculture cropland systems for the first time, based on two-year field measurements at three sites on different soils in Germany. Each site had an adjacent alley cropping agroforestry system and monoculture, and the agroforestry was established on former monoculture croplands 1 to 11 years prior to this study. We found that area-weighted soil CO 2 emissions from agroforestry (3.5−8.1 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 ) were comparable to monocultures (3.4−9.8 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 ), whereas area-weighted agroforestry generally had higher soil CH 4 uptake (0.4−1.3 kg C ha −1 yr −1 ) compared to monocultures (0.1−1.2 kg C ha −1 yr −1 ). Seasonal variations of soil CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes were strongly regulated by soil temperature and moisture, and the spatial variations were influenced by soil texture. Our results suggest that conversion of monoculture cropland to long-term alley cropping agroforestry system could be considered as a sustainable agriculture practice for its great potential for mitigating CH 4 emissions.

Agronomy for Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 45(1)
University of Göttingen (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, China Scholarship Council, BonaRes
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.