Measuring Engagement in a Video Conference

Video conferencing has become an invaluable tool to society and is essential in many professional and private settings. As the interaction of participants is purely virtual it lacks many aspects of “real life” including lack of or different feedback channels and henceforth the communication is less intimate. In particular, user engagement in video conferences is often difficult to assess for others and contributes to impediment of communication in general. This applies not only to small video conferences but even more so to conferences with a one to many topology. Measuring the user engagement in an accurate manner would provide a useful feedback channel to the speaker or organizer of a video conference and also enable many valued-added services such as predicting turn-taking for natural conversational speech intention and assisting AI-enabled video conference management. One of the challenges in measuring user engagement is to measure it outside an artificial lab setting and for an individual rather than an aggregate. In this work, we assess whether the problem of measuring user engagement is even well-defined. We also perform experiments with commercially available services and machine learning algorithms proposed by academia to test their ability of measuring user engagement in a realistic non-lab setting. Furthermore, we propose an outlier based algorithm and validate its superior performance against existing solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ismsit63511.2024.10757223
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Engagement in a Video Conference

Eicke Godehardt, Jörg Schäfer, M. Silva, Jonathan Cyriax Brast
Online and Blended Learning
article

Measuring Engagement in a Video Conference

Eicke Godehardt, Jörg Schäfer, M. Silva, Jonathan Cyriax Brast
article en

Abstract

Video conferencing has become an invaluable tool to society and is essential in many professional and private settings. As the interaction of participants is purely virtual it lacks many aspects of “real life” including lack of or different feedback channels and henceforth the communication is less intimate. In particular, user engagement in video conferences is often difficult to assess for others and contributes to impediment of communication in general. This applies not only to small video conferences but even more so to conferences with a one to many topology. Measuring the user engagement in an accurate manner would provide a useful feedback channel to the speaker or organizer of a video conference and also enable many valued-added services such as predicting turn-taking for natural conversational speech intention and assisting AI-enabled video conference management. One of the challenges in measuring user engagement is to measure it outside an artificial lab setting and for an individual rather than an aggregate. In this work, we assess whether the problem of measuring user engagement is even well-defined. We also perform experiments with commercially available services and machine learning algorithms proposed by academia to test their ability of measuring user engagement in a realistic non-lab setting. Furthermore, we propose an outlier based algorithm and validate its superior performance against existing solutions.

Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), LightMachinery (Canada) (CA), Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.