Feed additives for methane mitigation: Modeling the impact of feed additives on enteric methane emission of ruminants—Approaches and recommendations

Over the past decade, there has been considerable attention on mitigating enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from ruminants through the utilization of antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA). Administered in small quantities, these additives demonstrate potential for substantial reductions of methanogenesis. Mathematical models play a crucial role in comprehending and predicting the quantitative impact of AMFA on enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions across diverse diets and production systems. This study provides a comprehensive overview of methodologies for modeling the impact of AMFA on enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in ruminants, culminating in a set of recommendations for modeling approaches to quantify the impact of AMFA on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Key considerations encompass the type of models employed (i.e., empirical models including meta-analyses, machine learning models, and mechanistic models), the modeling objectives, data availability, modeling synergies and trade-offs associated with using AMFA, and model applications for enhanced understanding, prediction, and integration into higher levels of aggregation. Based on an evaluation of these critical aspects, a set of recommendations is presented concerning modeling approaches for quantifying the impact of AMFA on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and in support of farm-level, national, regional, and global inventories for accounting greenhouse gas emissions in ruminant production systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25049
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feed additives for methane mitigation: Modeling the impact of feed additives on enteric methane emission of ruminants—Approaches and recommendations

E. Kebreab, Ronaldo Vibart, A. Bannink, Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio et al.
17 citations
Journal of Dairy Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
9.65
article

Feed additives for methane mitigation: Modeling the impact of feed additives on enteric methane emission of ruminants—Approaches and recommendations

E. Kebreab, Ronaldo Vibart, A. Bannink, Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio, Mutian Niu, David R. Yáñez-Ruíz, Maguy Eugène, J. Dijkstra, F. Javier Giráldez García, J.L. Ellis
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been considerable attention on mitigating enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from ruminants through the utilization of antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA). Administered in small quantities, these additives demonstrate potential for substantial reductions of methanogenesis. Mathematical models play a crucial role in comprehending and predicting the quantitative impact of AMFA on enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions across diverse diets and production systems. This study provides a comprehensive overview of methodologies for modeling the impact of AMFA on enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in ruminants, culminating in a set of recommendations for modeling approaches to quantify the impact of AMFA on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Key considerations encompass the type of models employed (i.e., empirical models including meta-analyses, machine learning models, and mechanistic models), the modeling objectives, data availability, modeling synergies and trade-offs associated with using AMFA, and model applications for enhanced understanding, prediction, and integration into higher levels of aggregation. Based on an evaluation of these critical aspects, a set of recommendations is presented concerning modeling approaches for quantifying the impact of AMFA on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and in support of farm-level, national, regional, and global inventories for accounting greenhouse gas emissions in ruminant production systems.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 108(1)
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (AR), ETH Zurich (CH), AgResearch (NZ), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Estación Experimental del Zaidín (ES), Noble Research Institute (US), Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores (FR), University of Guelph (CA), University of California, Davis (US), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
9.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.