Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes

R-ISR is safe and feasible for patients with low rectal cancer. R-ISR is superior to L-ISR despite the operation time of R-ISR is longer. A randomised controlled trial will be performed to confirm the conclusion further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_320_23
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes

Yudong Qiu, Gang Chen, Lihua Shao, Wei Ge
1 citations
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
0.28
article

Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes

Yudong Qiu, Gang Chen, Lihua Shao, Wei Ge
article en
1 citations

Abstract

R-ISR is safe and feasible for patients with low rectal cancer. R-ISR is superior to L-ISR despite the operation time of R-ISR is longer. A randomised controlled trial will be performed to confirm the conclusion further.

Journal of Minimal Access SurgeryVol. 21(1)
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.