To clarify the criteria for stenosis of the celiac artery during ultrasound duplex scanning

BACKGROUND: Criteria for stenosis of the celiac artery in duplex ultrasound diagnostics based on measurements of peak systolic velocity of blood flow are still a discussed topic for the diagnosis of blood flow disorders in the branches of the abdominal aorta. AIM: To clarify the calculation formulas for determining the degree of emergency stenosis based on the literature speed indicators, compare the results obtained with each other and with angiographic data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: When calculating the dependence of the degree of stenosis on the speed of blood flow, the theoretical prerequisites of the mechanics of incompressible fluids, one of which is whole blood, were used. The Mathcad 15.0 algebraic computing software package was used. Data correlation was evaluated using the corr functional using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The value of the correlation coefficient was interpreted using the Cheddock scale. The relationship between the results of ultrasound and angiographic data was also considered using the concepts of evidence-based medicine for diagnostic tests (sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and accuracy). RESULTS: Statistical indicators of the “discrepancy” of the data obtained from the above calculation formulas and clinical angiographic observations were: standard deviation SD 25.90%, maximum absolute deviation Δ 93.71% and reduced error δ 93.71%. The correlation of the average strength between the Doppler and the corresponding angiographic data was established (R = 0.467). The indicators of ultrasound tests generally correspond to angiographic data and are characterized on average by the following parameters: sensitivity Se = 100%, specificity Sp = 75.02, prognostic values PPV = 50.00%, NPV = 100% and overall accuracy P = 78.79%. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the ultrasonographic duplex scanning data can be considered as satisfactorily determining the percentage of stenosis, which corresponds to the literature data on the ultimate sensitivity, specificity and prognostic value of detecting abdominal artery stenosis based on peak systolic velocity. At the same time, the given calculation formulas for the degree of stenosis, depending on the velocity parameters of blood flow, generally correctly reflect the degree of circulatory disorders in the abdominal trunk. Finally, the issue of the hemodynamic significance of disorders and the pathogenetic basis of the disease should be resolved on the basis of angiographic indicators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical academic journal
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/maj629664
Primary Topic
Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To clarify the criteria for stenosis of the celiac artery during ultrasound duplex scanning

Sergey S. Pertsov, А. А. Солодов, P. Yu. Sukhochev, С. А. Муслов et al.
Medical academic journal
Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
article

To clarify the criteria for stenosis of the celiac artery during ultrasound duplex scanning

Sergey S. Pertsov, А. А. Солодов, P. Yu. Sukhochev, С. А. Муслов, L. I. Merkusheva, Konstantin V. Bylov
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Criteria for stenosis of the celiac artery in duplex ultrasound diagnostics based on measurements of peak systolic velocity of blood flow are still a discussed topic for the diagnosis of blood flow disorders in the branches of the abdominal aorta. AIM: To clarify the calculation formulas for determining the degree of emergency stenosis based on the literature speed indicators, compare the results obtained with each other and with angiographic data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: When calculating the dependence of the degree of stenosis on the speed of blood flow, the theoretical prerequisites of the mechanics of incompressible fluids, one of which is whole blood, were used. The Mathcad 15.0 algebraic computing software package was used. Data correlation was evaluated using the corr functional using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The value of the correlation coefficient was interpreted using the Cheddock scale. The relationship between the results of ultrasound and angiographic data was also considered using the concepts of evidence-based medicine for diagnostic tests (sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and accuracy). RESULTS: Statistical indicators of the “discrepancy” of the data obtained from the above calculation formulas and clinical angiographic observations were: standard deviation SD 25.90%, maximum absolute deviation Δ 93.71% and reduced error δ 93.71%. The correlation of the average strength between the Doppler and the corresponding angiographic data was established (R = 0.467). The indicators of ultrasound tests generally correspond to angiographic data and are characterized on average by the following parameters: sensitivity Se = 100%, specificity Sp = 75.02, prognostic values PPV = 50.00%, NPV = 100% and overall accuracy P = 78.79%. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the ultrasonographic duplex scanning data can be considered as satisfactorily determining the percentage of stenosis, which corresponds to the literature data on the ultimate sensitivity, specificity and prognostic value of detecting abdominal artery stenosis based on peak systolic velocity. At the same time, the given calculation formulas for the degree of stenosis, depending on the velocity parameters of blood flow, generally correctly reflect the degree of circulatory disorders in the abdominal trunk. Finally, the issue of the hemodynamic significance of disorders and the pathogenetic basis of the disease should be resolved on the basis of angiographic indicators.

Medical academic journalVol. 24(3)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU), Texas Endosurgery Institute (US), Moscow State University (TJ), Medical Technologies (Czechia) (CZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.