Coupling mechanism analysis of CO2 non-Darcy flow in multi-scale reservoirs: A case study of the life-cycle process of fracturing-development in shale oil reservoirs

With policy support for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), an integrated approach that combines energy storage fracturing, CO 2 -enhanced oil recovery (EOR), and storage emerges as a promising direction for the shale oil industry. The process of energy storage fracturing induces significant changes in the pressure and saturation of the medium. However, conventional simulations often overlook the effects of fracturing and shut-in operations on the seepage field and production performance. Furthermore, fractured shale reservoirs exhibit complex non-Darcy flow characteristics due to intricate pore structures and multi-scale porous media. A comprehensive understanding of flow mechanisms is essential for effective reservoir development and CO 2 storage. This study establishes a multi-component simulation model that encompasses the life-cycle of fracturing, shut-in, production, and CO 2 huff-n-puff processes, thereby ensuring the continuity of the seepage field. The model accounts for the effect of nano-confinement on phase behavior by modifying the equation of state. Furthermore, the flux term is adjusted to incorporate Maxwell–Stefan diffusion, pre-/post-Darcy flow, and stress sensitivity. The embedded discrete fracture model (EDFM) is employed to simulate multiphase flow within multi-scale media, and the results from the validation model align satisfactorily with those derived from ECLIPSE. Mechanism analysis indicates that the interaction of multiple mechanisms significantly influences both production and storage performance. Under the multi-mechanism coupling, the cumulative oil production increased by 12.01%, while the utilization and storage factors increased by 62.93% and 8.93%, respectively. The role of molecular diffusion in shale oil reservoirs may be overstated, contributing only a 0.26% enhancement in oil production. Simulation results show that the energy storage fracturing strategy can increase oil production and net present value by 12.47% and 15.07%, respectively. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the CO 2 injection rate is the main factor affecting the recovery factor, followed by CO 2 injection time and the number of cycles, with fracturing fluid volume having the least impact. This study develops a multi-process, multi-mechanism simulation framework for multi-scale shale oil reservoirs. This framework provides a robust evaluation system for CCUS-EOR, facilitating informed decision-making in fracturing stimulation, development planning, and parameter optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Petroleum Science
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2024.12.018
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coupling mechanism analysis of CO2 non-Darcy flow in multi-scale reservoirs: A case study of the life-cycle process of fracturing-development in shale oil reservoirs

Malcolm Wilson, Shirish Patil, Zhenhua Rui, Guanglong Sheng et al.
9 citations
Petroleum Science
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
1.91
article

Coupling mechanism analysis of CO2 non-Darcy flow in multi-scale reservoirs: A case study of the life-cycle process of fracturing-development in shale oil reservoirs

Malcolm Wilson, Shirish Patil, Zhenhua Rui, Guanglong Sheng, Birol Dindoruk, Ting Hu, Haiyang Deng
article en
9 citations

Abstract

With policy support for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), an integrated approach that combines energy storage fracturing, CO 2 -enhanced oil recovery (EOR), and storage emerges as a promising direction for the shale oil industry. The process of energy storage fracturing induces significant changes in the pressure and saturation of the medium. However, conventional simulations often overlook the effects of fracturing and shut-in operations on the seepage field and production performance. Furthermore, fractured shale reservoirs exhibit complex non-Darcy flow characteristics due to intricate pore structures and multi-scale porous media. A comprehensive understanding of flow mechanisms is essential for effective reservoir development and CO 2 storage. This study establishes a multi-component simulation model that encompasses the life-cycle of fracturing, shut-in, production, and CO 2 huff-n-puff processes, thereby ensuring the continuity of the seepage field. The model accounts for the effect of nano-confinement on phase behavior by modifying the equation of state. Furthermore, the flux term is adjusted to incorporate Maxwell–Stefan diffusion, pre-/post-Darcy flow, and stress sensitivity. The embedded discrete fracture model (EDFM) is employed to simulate multiphase flow within multi-scale media, and the results from the validation model align satisfactorily with those derived from ECLIPSE. Mechanism analysis indicates that the interaction of multiple mechanisms significantly influences both production and storage performance. Under the multi-mechanism coupling, the cumulative oil production increased by 12.01%, while the utilization and storage factors increased by 62.93% and 8.93%, respectively. The role of molecular diffusion in shale oil reservoirs may be overstated, contributing only a 0.26% enhancement in oil production. Simulation results show that the energy storage fracturing strategy can increase oil production and net present value by 12.47% and 15.07%, respectively. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the CO 2 injection rate is the main factor affecting the recovery factor, followed by CO 2 injection time and the number of cycles, with fracturing fluid volume having the least impact. This study develops a multi-process, multi-mechanism simulation framework for multi-scale shale oil reservoirs. This framework provides a robust evaluation system for CCUS-EOR, facilitating informed decision-making in fracturing stimulation, development planning, and parameter optimization.

Petroleum ScienceVol. 22(3)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Yangtze University (CN), University of Regina (CA), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Energy Technologies Institute (GB), BP (United States) (US), University of Houston (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.