Characterization of Pain in Lipedema: Reliability and Validity of Pain Pressure Thresholds and Hand-Held Sphygmomanometer Assessments in People with Lipedema

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Lipedema is a chronic condition characterized by abnormal deposition of subcutaneous adipose tissue, leading to pain. The lack of internationally recognized diagnostic criteria complicates the characterization of pain. Physiological parameters such as pain pressure threshold (PPT) represent promising prognostic markers for diagnosing lipedema, yet they remain understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of two pain pressure measurements, PPT and the hand-held sphygmomanometer (HHS) in lipedema. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 28 adult females diagnosed with lipedema were recruited. Both PPT, using a digital algometer, and HHS, using a manual aneroid HHS, were performed to assess pain in the lower limbs. The testing was performed in a standing position with PPT and HHS placed on the calf. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were employed to assess the within session reliability, while the validity between PPT and HHS was analyzed using <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> in a linear regression model. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The results showed excellent reliability for both PPT and HHS, with ICC indicating high consistency (ICC = 0.93 to 0.97) and CV showing acceptable scores (CV = 3.62% to 9.06%). In addition, good validity between PPT and HHS was also observed (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.69 to 0.74), suggesting that HHS can be a reliable alternative to PPT for pain assessment in lipedema. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> These findings have important clinical implications, as they expand the knowledge of pain characterization in people with lipedema, potentially aiding in diagnostic refinement. In addition, a cost-effective and accessible method for assessing pain was examined (i.e., HHS), showing promising findings and providing an objective method to help diagnose lipedema.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lymphatic Research and Biology
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2024.0058
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Lymphatic System and Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of Pain in Lipedema: Reliability and Validity of Pain Pressure Thresholds and Hand-Held Sphygmomanometer Assessments in People with Lipedema

Sara Mantovani, Luca Fumagalli, Daniele Aloisi, Francesco Bettariga et al.
3 citations
Lymphatic Research and Biology
Lymphatic System and Diseases
0.85
article

Characterization of Pain in Lipedema: Reliability and Validity of Pain Pressure Thresholds and Hand-Held Sphygmomanometer Assessments in People with Lipedema

Sara Mantovani, Luca Fumagalli, Daniele Aloisi, Francesco Bettariga, Luca Maestroni
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Lipedema is a chronic condition characterized by abnormal deposition of subcutaneous adipose tissue, leading to pain. The lack of internationally recognized diagnostic criteria complicates the characterization of pain. Physiological parameters such as pain pressure threshold (PPT) represent promising prognostic markers for diagnosing lipedema, yet they remain understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of two pain pressure measurements, PPT and the hand-held sphygmomanometer (HHS) in lipedema. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 28 adult females diagnosed with lipedema were recruited. Both PPT, using a digital algometer, and HHS, using a manual aneroid HHS, were performed to assess pain in the lower limbs. The testing was performed in a standing position with PPT and HHS placed on the calf. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were employed to assess the within session reliability, while the validity between PPT and HHS was analyzed using <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> in a linear regression model. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The results showed excellent reliability for both PPT and HHS, with ICC indicating high consistency (ICC = 0.93 to 0.97) and CV showing acceptable scores (CV = 3.62% to 9.06%). In addition, good validity between PPT and HHS was also observed (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.69 to 0.74), suggesting that HHS can be a reliable alternative to PPT for pain assessment in lipedema. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> These findings have important clinical implications, as they expand the knowledge of pain characterization in people with lipedema, potentially aiding in diagnostic refinement. In addition, a cost-effective and accessible method for assessing pain was examined (i.e., HHS), showing promising findings and providing an objective method to help diagnose lipedema.

Lymphatic Research and BiologyVol. 23(2)
Edith Cowan University (AU), Ospedale San Giuseppe (IT), Ospedale Bellaria (IT), Middlesex University London (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Lymphatic System and Diseases
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.