How to choose an application for conducting online interviews? Methodical recommendations

The article addresses the issue of selecting an application for conducting online interviews. An attempt is made to describe the specifics of qualitative online interviews from the perspective of methodological principles that impose constraints, open opportunities, and set requirements for online interview tools. As a result of analyzing these principles, a list of parameters for the applications suitable for comparison is formulated: no restrictions in the free version; unlimited conference duration; capability for video recording; screen sharing capability; ability to use without video; a separate conference chat; automatic chat saving; ability to use without an account; capability for interviewing informants in non-Russian-speaking environments; integration with electronic calendars. Using Zoom, Telegram, Yandex.Telemost, and Google Meet as examples, a comparison is made to select the best tool for conducting online interviews. The author emphasizes that the developed recommendations represent only the initial stage of methodological reflection on the choice of applications aimed at the preliminary structuring of the material.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology methodology methods mathematical modeling (Sociology 4M)
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19181/4m.2024.33.1.5
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to choose an application for conducting online interviews? Methodical recommendations

Denis Popov
Sociology methodology methods mathematical modeling (Sociology 4M)
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

How to choose an application for conducting online interviews? Methodical recommendations

Denis Popov
article en

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of selecting an application for conducting online interviews. An attempt is made to describe the specifics of qualitative online interviews from the perspective of methodological principles that impose constraints, open opportunities, and set requirements for online interview tools. As a result of analyzing these principles, a list of parameters for the applications suitable for comparison is formulated: no restrictions in the free version; unlimited conference duration; capability for video recording; screen sharing capability; ability to use without video; a separate conference chat; automatic chat saving; ability to use without an account; capability for interviewing informants in non-Russian-speaking environments; integration with electronic calendars. Using Zoom, Telegram, Yandex.Telemost, and Google Meet as examples, a comparison is made to select the best tool for conducting online interviews. The author emphasizes that the developed recommendations represent only the initial stage of methodological reflection on the choice of applications aimed at the preliminary structuring of the material.

Sociology methodology methods mathematical modeling (Sociology 4M)Vol. 30(58)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How to choose an application for conducting online interviews? Methodical recommendations — Denis Popov · Sociology methodology methods mathematical modeling (Sociology 4M) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS