Modelling height to crown base using non-parametric methods for mixed forests in China

The height to crown base (HCB) of a tree is a vital characteristic that reflects the self-thinning ability of a tree, and it is used to determine the crown size. and predict the crown recession rate. This study simulated the HCB of Spruce fir broadleaved mixed forest in Northeast China using four non-parametric model approaches: generalized additive model, Cubist, boosted regression tree (BRT), and multiple adaptive regression spline. Because of the different genetic characteristics and growth patterns of different tree species, species-specific tree groups were formed, and the HCB of each species-specific group was simulated by the different models. Relative importance and partial dependence analyses were performed to identify the primary HCB predictors (including tree, stand, stand spatial structure, density and competition factors) and their relationships with the HCB of the four tree species groups. The relative importance was higher for individual tree variables (77.54 %, 31.02 %, 31.12 %, and 73.69 % for coniferous, spruce-fir, hard broadleaved, and soft broadleaved groups, respectively) and stand variables (5.00 %, 20.34 %, 11.03 %, and 8.71 % for coniferous, spruce-fir, hard broadleaved, and soft broadleaved groups, respectively) compared with stand spatial structure variables (4.57 %, 12.14 %, 21.91 %, and 5.89 % for coniferous, spruce-fir, hard broadleaved, and soft broadleaved groups, respectively), density indexes variables (2.17 %, 1.28 %, 4.05 %, and 2.87 % for coniferous, spruce-fir, hard broadleaved, and soft broadleaved groups, respectively), and tree species variables (10.79 %, 35.20 %, 31.90 %, and 8.84 % for coniferous, spruce-fir, hard broadleaved, and soft broadleaved groups, respectively). BRT and Cubist were the best approaches for modelling the four species-group specific HCBs. Although spatial structure variables had minor relative importance, further in-depth investigations are warranted. • Four nonparametric models were considered for HCB (height to crown base) of Spruce-fir broadleaved mixed forest. • The BRT (Boosted Regression Tree) and Cubist models were the best approaches in modelling four species-group specific HCB. • Spatial structure variables had minor relative importance, it deserves to be investigated deeply. • Our study provides insights for protecting, regulating, and improving forest ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Informatics
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102957
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling height to crown base using non-parametric methods for mixed forests in China

Xuefan Hu, Manyi Du, Ram P. Sharma, Yang Yu et al.
3 citations
Ecological Informatics
Forest ecology and management
2.07
article

Modelling height to crown base using non-parametric methods for mixed forests in China

Xuefan Hu, Manyi Du, Ram P. Sharma, Yang Yu, Linyan Feng, Zeyu Zhou, Xiaohong Zhang, Huiru Zhang, Lianjin Zhang, Huanying Feng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The height to crown base (HCB) of a tree is a vital characteristic that reflects the self-thinning ability of a tree, and it is used to determine the crown size. and predict the crown recession rate. This study simulated the HCB of Spruce fir broadleaved mixed forest in Northeast China using four non-parametric model approaches: generalized additive model, Cubist, boosted regression tree (BRT), and multiple adaptive regression spline. Because of the different genetic characteristics and growth patterns of different tree species, species-specific tree groups were formed, and the HCB of each species-specific group was simulated by the different models. Relative importance and partial dependence analyses were performed to identify the primary HCB predictors (including tree, stand, stand spatial structure, density and competition factors) and their relationships with the HCB of the four tree species groups. The relative importance was higher for individual tree variables (77.54 %, 31.02 %, 31.12 %, and 73.69 % for coniferous, spruce-fir, hard broadleaved, and soft broadleaved groups, respectively) and stand variables (5.00 %, 20.34 %, 11.03 %, and 8.71 % for coniferous, spruce-fir, hard broadleaved, and soft broadleaved groups, respectively) compared with stand spatial structure variables (4.57 %, 12.14 %, 21.91 %, and 5.89 % for coniferous, spruce-fir, hard broadleaved, and soft broadleaved groups, respectively), density indexes variables (2.17 %, 1.28 %, 4.05 %, and 2.87 % for coniferous, spruce-fir, hard broadleaved, and soft broadleaved groups, respectively), and tree species variables (10.79 %, 35.20 %, 31.90 %, and 8.84 % for coniferous, spruce-fir, hard broadleaved, and soft broadleaved groups, respectively). BRT and Cubist were the best approaches for modelling the four species-group specific HCBs. Although spatial structure variables had minor relative importance, further in-depth investigations are warranted. • Four nonparametric models were considered for HCB (height to crown base) of Spruce-fir broadleaved mixed forest. • The BRT (Boosted Regression Tree) and Cubist models were the best approaches in modelling four species-group specific HCB. • Spatial structure variables had minor relative importance, it deserves to be investigated deeply. • Our study provides insights for protecting, regulating, and improving forest ecosystems.

Ecological InformaticsVol. 85
Tribhuvan University (NP), Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques (CN), Chinese Academy of Forestry (CN), State Forestry and Grassland Administration (CN), Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (CN), Experimental Center of Forestry in North China (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Forest ecology and management
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.