Think-Aloud Protocols in process studies revisited: Suggestions for veridicality

Thinking-Aloud or Think-Aloud Protocols have been used to study thinking processes in varied fields such as psychology, business, sports, industry, and education. Recently, studies have tried to see its application in teaching in both offline and online modes. Despite its success, as demonstrated by these studies, controversies concerning the believability of thinking aloud and the process of reactivity have been raised. However, no explicit solution has been provided. In response to the issues, this paper critically reviewed examples of think-aloud protocols using Bowles’s guide to TAP (2008). The results show that (1) problems of the reactivity process stem from the nature of the tasks given, and (2) to minimize the problems of reactivity, the TAP data collection procedure should move from the least to the most intervention of the researcher.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EduLite Journal of English Education Literature and Culture
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30659/e.9.2.73-87
Primary Topic
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Think-Aloud Protocols in process studies revisited: Suggestions for veridicality

Sugirin Sugirin, Jamilah Jamilah, Indah Permatasari, Joko Priyana
EduLite Journal of English Education Literature and Culture
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
article

Think-Aloud Protocols in process studies revisited: Suggestions for veridicality

Sugirin Sugirin, Jamilah Jamilah, Indah Permatasari, Joko Priyana
article en

Abstract

Thinking-Aloud or Think-Aloud Protocols have been used to study thinking processes in varied fields such as psychology, business, sports, industry, and education. Recently, studies have tried to see its application in teaching in both offline and online modes. Despite its success, as demonstrated by these studies, controversies concerning the believability of thinking aloud and the process of reactivity have been raised. However, no explicit solution has been provided. In response to the issues, this paper critically reviewed examples of think-aloud protocols using Bowles’s guide to TAP (2008). The results show that (1) problems of the reactivity process stem from the nature of the tasks given, and (2) to minimize the problems of reactivity, the TAP data collection procedure should move from the least to the most intervention of the researcher.

EduLite Journal of English Education Literature and CultureVol. 9(2)
Yogyakarta State University (ID)
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.