STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF PHYSICALLY INFORMED NEURAL NETWORKS USING THE EXAMPLE OF BEAM DEFORMATION

The paper investigates the accuracy of beam deformation prediction using physically informed neural networks (PINN) compared to conventional fully connected neural networks. For the experiment, an analytical solution to the deflection problem of a beam hinged at one end, fixed at the other, and loaded with a point force was used. A dataset was created in which the position of load application was varied to obtain different deflection values. The architecture of the neural network was based on a fully connected structure trained for deflection prediction. During the study, two loss functions were compared: a standard one that minimizes the mean square error (MSE) and a complex one that includes a physical component. The latter took into account the laws of mechanics, in particular the differential equations of beam deflection, which were integrated into the learning process through the gradients of the network's output data. The results showed that incorporating physical laws into the training process significantly improves the accuracy of predictions, especially with limited data. The comparison demonstrated that the physically informed neural network provides better results than the conventional model and more accurately reflects the behavior of the beam under load. The obtained findings emphasize the effectiveness of the PINN approach for solving engineering problems where physical models and laws play an important role.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the National Technical University «KhPI» Series Dynamics and Strength of Machines
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-9130.2024.2.318912
Primary Topic
Engineering Technology and Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF PHYSICALLY INFORMED NEURAL NETWORKS USING THE EXAMPLE OF BEAM DEFORMATION

Олексій Водка, Mariya Shapovalova, Ruslan Babudzhan
Bulletin of the National Technical University «KhPI» Series Dynamics and Strength of Machines
Engineering Technology and Methodologies
article

STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF PHYSICALLY INFORMED NEURAL NETWORKS USING THE EXAMPLE OF BEAM DEFORMATION

Олексій Водка, Mariya Shapovalova, Ruslan Babudzhan
article en

Abstract

The paper investigates the accuracy of beam deformation prediction using physically informed neural networks (PINN) compared to conventional fully connected neural networks. For the experiment, an analytical solution to the deflection problem of a beam hinged at one end, fixed at the other, and loaded with a point force was used. A dataset was created in which the position of load application was varied to obtain different deflection values. The architecture of the neural network was based on a fully connected structure trained for deflection prediction. During the study, two loss functions were compared: a standard one that minimizes the mean square error (MSE) and a complex one that includes a physical component. The latter took into account the laws of mechanics, in particular the differential equations of beam deflection, which were integrated into the learning process through the gradients of the network's output data. The results showed that incorporating physical laws into the training process significantly improves the accuracy of predictions, especially with limited data. The comparison demonstrated that the physically informed neural network provides better results than the conventional model and more accurately reflects the behavior of the beam under load. The obtained findings emphasize the effectiveness of the PINN approach for solving engineering problems where physical models and laws play an important role.

Bulletin of the National Technical University «KhPI» Series Dynamics and Strength of Machines(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Engineering Technology and Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.