Comparative Analysis of Different Graphite Concentrations in Micro-PMEDM Drilling

Micro-electrical discharge machining is valuable in industry thanks to its ability to realise precise micro-holes with high aspect ratios. However, a limitation of the technology is represented by its low material removal rate compared to other material removal technologies. Therefore, different strategies are under investigation to make the process faster. One of these strategies consists of adding powders into the dielectric. This process is called powder-mixed electrical discharge machining (PMEDM). This paper focusses on the optimisation of different aspects of this process, particularly the effects of the powder concentration, the presence of the surfactant, the stirring of the dielectric during the machining and the stability in time of the dielectric in micro-drilling. Graphite was used as powder in pure water, and in some tests a dispersant was also added. The concentration of the powder was varied, maintaining the same ratio between the graphite and the surfactant. The optimal graphite concentration was also used without the dispersant but with a changed parameter for the stirring system. The powder-mixed dielectrics showed better removal performance than pure water, and the best graphite concentration was the highest. The material removal rate increased by 40–150% compared to pure water. The tests made without dispersant showed that its presence did not improve the machining rate, while the stirring system deeply affected the process. The electrode wear benefitted from the reduction in machining time, and when the dispersant was used, electrode wear was lowered up to 50% compared to pure water. The trend of the electrode law of motion was affected by the concentration of the contaminant (debris from the erosion and powder). The geometrical characteristics were also affected by the presence of the powder, which changed the spark length. With the highest graphite concentration, radial overcut increased up to 50% compared to pure water. The stability in time of the dielectric when the powder was added was also evaluated and it was found that an efficient stirring system without the use of dispersant is a good solution, able to limit the possible sedimentation and aggregation of the powder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9010001
Primary Topic
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Different Graphite Concentrations in Micro-PMEDM Drilling

Giuseppe Rosace, Valentina Trovato, Chiara Ravasio, Giuseppe Pellegrini
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
article

Comparative Analysis of Different Graphite Concentrations in Micro-PMEDM Drilling

Giuseppe Rosace, Valentina Trovato, Chiara Ravasio, Giuseppe Pellegrini
article en

Abstract

Micro-electrical discharge machining is valuable in industry thanks to its ability to realise precise micro-holes with high aspect ratios. However, a limitation of the technology is represented by its low material removal rate compared to other material removal technologies. Therefore, different strategies are under investigation to make the process faster. One of these strategies consists of adding powders into the dielectric. This process is called powder-mixed electrical discharge machining (PMEDM). This paper focusses on the optimisation of different aspects of this process, particularly the effects of the powder concentration, the presence of the surfactant, the stirring of the dielectric during the machining and the stability in time of the dielectric in micro-drilling. Graphite was used as powder in pure water, and in some tests a dispersant was also added. The concentration of the powder was varied, maintaining the same ratio between the graphite and the surfactant. The optimal graphite concentration was also used without the dispersant but with a changed parameter for the stirring system. The powder-mixed dielectrics showed better removal performance than pure water, and the best graphite concentration was the highest. The material removal rate increased by 40–150% compared to pure water. The tests made without dispersant showed that its presence did not improve the machining rate, while the stirring system deeply affected the process. The electrode wear benefitted from the reduction in machining time, and when the dispersant was used, electrode wear was lowered up to 50% compared to pure water. The trend of the electrode law of motion was affected by the concentration of the contaminant (debris from the erosion and powder). The geometrical characteristics were also affected by the presence of the powder, which changed the spark length. With the highest graphite concentration, radial overcut increased up to 50% compared to pure water. The stability in time of the dielectric when the powder was added was also evaluated and it was found that an efficient stirring system without the use of dispersant is a good solution, able to limit the possible sedimentation and aggregation of the powder.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 9(1)
University of Bergamo (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.