Global shocks to fertilizer markets: Impacts on prices, demand and farm profitability

• Supply chain disruptions caused major spikes in fertilizer prices during 2021–2022. • Globally, the price shocks only had a muted impact on fertilizer usage. • On average, profitability for commercial crop producers was affected only mildly. • Farmer profitability in low-income Africa was affected more severely, however. • Low usage makes African smallholders less vulnerable to fertilizer supply shocks. During 2021–2022, spiking fertilizer prices raised fears that fertilizer application would drop around the world, leading to lower crop production, higher food prices, and greater food insecurity. Even writing mid-2024, a paucity of data impedes a full assessment of how the underlying global market shocks may have affected farmers and food production around the world. Using proxy indicators for fertilizer demand and farm profitability, we find that despite the steep increase in input costs, global demand for fertilizer fell only modestly during the 2022–2023 crop cycle, suggesting many (commercial) farmers were able and willing to absorb increased input costs in the context of generally good harvest prospects and, at the time, high crop prices. However, we also find the fertilizer price spikes have not been felt equally, with many farmers in Africa estimated to have been affected more adversely, even though with varied impacts also amongst those farmers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Policy
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102790
Citations
40
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
53.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global shocks to fertilizer markets: Impacts on prices, demand and farm profitability

Rob Vos, Joseph W. Glauber, Charlotte Hebebrand, Brendan Rice
40 citations
Food Policy
Agricultural Economics and Policy
53.69
article

Global shocks to fertilizer markets: Impacts on prices, demand and farm profitability

Rob Vos, Joseph W. Glauber, Charlotte Hebebrand, Brendan Rice
article en
40 citations

Abstract

• Supply chain disruptions caused major spikes in fertilizer prices during 2021–2022. • Globally, the price shocks only had a muted impact on fertilizer usage. • On average, profitability for commercial crop producers was affected only mildly. • Farmer profitability in low-income Africa was affected more severely, however. • Low usage makes African smallholders less vulnerable to fertilizer supply shocks. During 2021–2022, spiking fertilizer prices raised fears that fertilizer application would drop around the world, leading to lower crop production, higher food prices, and greater food insecurity. Even writing mid-2024, a paucity of data impedes a full assessment of how the underlying global market shocks may have affected farmers and food production around the world. Using proxy indicators for fertilizer demand and farm profitability, we find that despite the steep increase in input costs, global demand for fertilizer fell only modestly during the 2022–2023 crop cycle, suggesting many (commercial) farmers were able and willing to absorb increased input costs in the context of generally good harvest prospects and, at the time, high crop prices. However, we also find the fertilizer price spikes have not been felt equally, with many farmers in Africa estimated to have been affected more adversely, even though with varied impacts also amongst those farmers.

Food PolicyVol. 133
International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
United States Agency for International Development, European Commission, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Agricultural Economics and Policy
53.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.