Does Basis Set Superposition Error Significantly Affect Post‐<scp>CCSD</scp>(<i>T</i>) Corrections?

We have investigated the title question for both a subset of the W4-11 total atomization energies benchmark, and for the A24x8 noncovalent interactions benchmark. Overall, counterpoise corrections to post-CCSD(T) contributions are about two orders of magnitude less important than those to the CCSD(T) interaction energy. Counterpoise corrections for connected quadruple substitutions (Q) are negligible, and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mfenced><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mfenced> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {(Q)}_{\Lambda}-(Q) $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> or <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_4-(Q) $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> especially so. In contrast, for atomization energies, the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_3-(T) $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> counterpoise correction can reach about 0.05 kcal/mol for small basis sets like cc-pVDZ, thought it rapidly tapers off with cc-pVTZ and especially aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets. It is reduced to insignificance by the extrapolation of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_3-(T) $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> applied in both W4 and HEAT thermochemistry protocols. In noncovalent dimers, the differential BSSE on post-CCSD(T) correlation contributions is negligible even in basis sets as small as the unpolarized split-valence cc-pVDZ(no d).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.70007
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Basis Set Superposition Error Significantly Affect Post‐CCSD(T) Corrections?

Emmanouil Semidalas, Jan M. L. Martin, Margarita Shepelenko, Vladimir Fishman
5 citations
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
1.69
article

Does Basis Set Superposition Error Significantly Affect Post‐CCSD(T) Corrections?

Emmanouil Semidalas, Jan M. L. Martin, Margarita Shepelenko, Vladimir Fishman
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We have investigated the title question for both a subset of the W4-11 total atomization energies benchmark, and for the A24x8 noncovalent interactions benchmark. Overall, counterpoise corrections to post-CCSD(T) contributions are about two orders of magnitude less important than those to the CCSD(T) interaction energy. Counterpoise corrections for connected quadruple substitutions (Q) are negligible, and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mfenced><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mfenced> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi></mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {(Q)}_{\Lambda}-(Q) $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> or <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_4-(Q) $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> especially so. In contrast, for atomization energies, the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_3-(T) $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> counterpoise correction can reach about 0.05 kcal/mol for small basis sets like cc-pVDZ, thought it rapidly tapers off with cc-pVTZ and especially aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets. It is reduced to insignificance by the extrapolation of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mfenced><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_3-(T) $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> applied in both W4 and HEAT thermochemistry protocols. In noncovalent dimers, the differential BSSE on post-CCSD(T) correlation contributions is negligible even in basis sets as small as the unpolarized split-valence cc-pVDZ(no d).

Journal of Computational ChemistryVol. 46(1)
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
University of Florida, Israel Science Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.