Methods for quantifying the cooling effect of urban green spaces using remote sensing: A comparative study

• Three methods for quantifying the cooling effect of urban green spaces were verified. • The application of the buffer averaging method is subject to high uncertainty. • The accuracy of the results of the visual interpretation method is guaranteed. • The basin analogy method can be used in certain situations. • Standardization of the calculation methods is imperative. The cooling effect of urban green space (UGS) and its influencing factors have been extensively studied. However, the related results are sporadic, irregular, and even contradictory, which largely prevented the application of results to practical actions. One of the main reason may be the lack of consistency in the literature regarding the method used to quantify the cooling effect of UGS. In this study, three common methods using to quantify the cooling effect of UGS including buffer averaging method, visual interpretation method and basin analogy method were verified, compared, and evaluated. This study confirmed that different quantitative methods of measuring the cooling effect of UGS can lead to considerable differences in the results. The buffer averaging method is only applicable to conditions that the shape of UGS is regular and its surrounding landscape is homogenized, otherwise the cooling effect is easily overestimated. Visual interpretation method is the most laborious but recommended method, since it has high accuracy and can describe the directionality of cooling effect of the UGS to surrounding environment. The cooling effect quantified using basin analogy method may be uniformly overestimated or underestimated with the setting of the slope threshold, but it does not affect its accurate representation of the strength order of the cooling effect among different UGSs. The results calculated by visual interpretation method and basin analogy method are credible and highly correlated. This study emphasizes the importance of selecting and unifying quantitative method of cooling effect of UGS, which also helps to parallel compare and organize the results of relevant studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape and Urban Planning
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105289
Citations
23
Primary Topic
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods for quantifying the cooling effect of urban green spaces using remote sensing: A comparative study

Yiqi Yu, Shihan Zhang, Jie Xu, Tao Wu et al.
23 citations
Landscape and Urban Planning
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
4.73
article

Methods for quantifying the cooling effect of urban green spaces using remote sensing: A comparative study

Yiqi Yu, Shihan Zhang, Jie Xu, Tao Wu, Wen Zhou
article en
23 citations

Abstract

• Three methods for quantifying the cooling effect of urban green spaces were verified. • The application of the buffer averaging method is subject to high uncertainty. • The accuracy of the results of the visual interpretation method is guaranteed. • The basin analogy method can be used in certain situations. • Standardization of the calculation methods is imperative. The cooling effect of urban green space (UGS) and its influencing factors have been extensively studied. However, the related results are sporadic, irregular, and even contradictory, which largely prevented the application of results to practical actions. One of the main reason may be the lack of consistency in the literature regarding the method used to quantify the cooling effect of UGS. In this study, three common methods using to quantify the cooling effect of UGS including buffer averaging method, visual interpretation method and basin analogy method were verified, compared, and evaluated. This study confirmed that different quantitative methods of measuring the cooling effect of UGS can lead to considerable differences in the results. The buffer averaging method is only applicable to conditions that the shape of UGS is regular and its surrounding landscape is homogenized, otherwise the cooling effect is easily overestimated. Visual interpretation method is the most laborious but recommended method, since it has high accuracy and can describe the directionality of cooling effect of the UGS to surrounding environment. The cooling effect quantified using basin analogy method may be uniformly overestimated or underestimated with the setting of the slope threshold, but it does not affect its accurate representation of the strength order of the cooling effect among different UGSs. The results calculated by visual interpretation method and basin analogy method are credible and highly correlated. This study emphasizes the importance of selecting and unifying quantitative method of cooling effect of UGS, which also helps to parallel compare and organize the results of relevant studies.

Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 256
Yangzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Yangzhou University
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.