Supporting the drive for net zero by decarbonising general practice – A longitudinal study protocol

<ns3:p>Introduction The urgency to address climate change and reduce carbon emissions in healthcare, highlighted in the United Kingdom (UK) by the 'Delivering a 'Net Zero' National Health Service (NHS)' report, emphasises the need for healthcare organisations to adopt and integrate sustainability practices. General practice is recognised as a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, but evidence on achieving effective decarbonisation in general practice is limited, a knowledge gap that urgently needs further research. This study aims to examine the current approaches general practice uses for decarbonisation and to provide practical recommendations for facilitating, advancing, and sustaining these efforts, contributing to the goal of a net zero NHS. Methods and analysis This 30-month longitudinal case study spans three geographical sites in England and uses a mixed methods study design. It adopts a comprehensive approach, merging sociological (Normalisation Process Theory - NPT) and behavioural theories (Theoretical Domains Framework - TDF) to understand and address factors influencing decarbonisation efforts in general practice. NPT focuses on collective behaviours, emphasising relationships and interactions among professionals, patients, and stakeholders. TDF, with 14 domains simplifying behavioural change theories, concentrates on individual, social, and environmental factors. A systematic review will be conducted, and quantitative and qualitative data will be collected over a 12-month period from general practice, staff, patients, public, and key stakeholders’ perspectives through surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Additionally, a non-clinical carbon calculator, alongside prescribing data, will be gathered to assess measurable changes in carbon emissions, informing a budget impact model for practice-specific and generic use. Dissemination A dynamic dissemination and impact strategy is aimed at ensuring broad awareness, adoption, and accelerated uptake of decarbonisation measures. Outputs, including lay summaries, factsheets, policy briefs and academic presentations will be produced throughout the study and undergo regular review, targeting key audiences and ensuring alignment with regional and national goals.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NIHR Open Research
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13833.1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting the drive for net zero by decarbonising general practice – A longitudinal study protocol

Jeremy R. Dale, Helen Twohig, Helen Atherton, Michael B. Gregg et al.
4 citations
NIHR Open Research
Climate Change and Health Impacts
1.26
article

Supporting the drive for net zero by decarbonising general practice – A longitudinal study protocol

Jeremy R. Dale, Helen Twohig, Helen Atherton, Michael B. Gregg, Rachel Spencer, Sue Jowett, Abi Eccles, Ana Raquel Nunes, Frederik Dahlmann, Laura Nelson, Florence Karaba, Olivia Geddes
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<ns3:p>Introduction The urgency to address climate change and reduce carbon emissions in healthcare, highlighted in the United Kingdom (UK) by the 'Delivering a 'Net Zero' National Health Service (NHS)' report, emphasises the need for healthcare organisations to adopt and integrate sustainability practices. General practice is recognised as a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, but evidence on achieving effective decarbonisation in general practice is limited, a knowledge gap that urgently needs further research. This study aims to examine the current approaches general practice uses for decarbonisation and to provide practical recommendations for facilitating, advancing, and sustaining these efforts, contributing to the goal of a net zero NHS. Methods and analysis This 30-month longitudinal case study spans three geographical sites in England and uses a mixed methods study design. It adopts a comprehensive approach, merging sociological (Normalisation Process Theory - NPT) and behavioural theories (Theoretical Domains Framework - TDF) to understand and address factors influencing decarbonisation efforts in general practice. NPT focuses on collective behaviours, emphasising relationships and interactions among professionals, patients, and stakeholders. TDF, with 14 domains simplifying behavioural change theories, concentrates on individual, social, and environmental factors. A systematic review will be conducted, and quantitative and qualitative data will be collected over a 12-month period from general practice, staff, patients, public, and key stakeholders’ perspectives through surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Additionally, a non-clinical carbon calculator, alongside prescribing data, will be gathered to assess measurable changes in carbon emissions, informing a budget impact model for practice-specific and generic use. Dissemination A dynamic dissemination and impact strategy is aimed at ensuring broad awareness, adoption, and accelerated uptake of decarbonisation measures. Outputs, including lay summaries, factsheets, policy briefs and academic presentations will be produced throughout the study and undergo regular review, targeting key audiences and ensuring alignment with regional and national goals.</ns3:p>

NIHR Open ResearchVol. 4
House of Representatives (NL), University of Warwick (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust (GB), University of Southampton (GB), Keele University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Royal College of General Practitioners, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Delivery Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.