Deep Learning-Based Real-Time Data Quality Assessment and Anomaly Detection for Large-Scale Distributed Data Streams
Time delay and data quality degradation pose significant challenges in large-scale distributed data streams processing. This paper proposes a deep learning-based realtime data quality assessment and anomaly detection method for distributed streaming data environments. The proposed approach integrates quality-aware feature extraction with adaptive deep neural networks to enable real-time quality monitoring and anomaly detection. A multi-dimensional quality assessment framework is developed, incorporating temporal-spatial correlations and stream characteristics for comprehensive quality evaluation. The system implements a distributed architecture with parallel processing capabilities, enabling scalable operations across multiple nodes while maintaining low-latency responses. A novel online learning mechanism is introduced to adapt model parameters dynamically, ensuring robust performance under evolving data patterns. Experimental evaluation conducted on three large-scale datasets, including industrial IoT sensors (2.5TB), network traffic (1.8TB), and financial transactions (3.2TB), demonstrates superior performance compared to traditional methods. The system achieves 97.8% detection accuracy while maintaining processing latency below 10ms, with linear scalability up to 128 nodes. Results show consistent performance improvement across different operational scenarios, with 95% precision in anomaly detection and throughput exceeding 1.2 million events per second.
Authors
- Hanqing Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1746-5157)
- Xinqiao Jia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3564-5576)
- Chen Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8364-5749)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Medical and All Body Health Research
- Published
- 2024-12-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.54660/ijmbhr.2025.6.1.01-11
- Citations
- 11
- Primary Topic
- Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.82