The Dialectic of the Rome Statute: Oppositeness and Unity of the Complementarity and Corrective Function of the International Criminal Court

Under international law, it is each State’s obligation and responsibility to recognize the most serious crimes committed against the international community, as well as criminalize and conduct effective investigations and prosecution of them. The establishment of a permanent International Criminal Court, whose well-known complementarity principle is one of its central tenets, has finally emerged as a pillar in the fight against the impunity of international crimes. The article derives from various implementations a test for determining the characteristics and functions of the correction function of international law, thus presents the argument that the Rome Statute’s complementary role provides a corrective function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Italian Review of Legal History
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/2464-8914/27625
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dialectic of the Rome Statute: Oppositeness and Unity of the Complementarity and Corrective Function of the International Criminal Court

Dikran M. Zenginkuzucu
Italian Review of Legal History
International Law and Human Rights
article

The Dialectic of the Rome Statute: Oppositeness and Unity of the Complementarity and Corrective Function of the International Criminal Court

Dikran M. Zenginkuzucu
article en

Abstract

Under international law, it is each State’s obligation and responsibility to recognize the most serious crimes committed against the international community, as well as criminalize and conduct effective investigations and prosecution of them. The establishment of a permanent International Criminal Court, whose well-known complementarity principle is one of its central tenets, has finally emerged as a pillar in the fight against the impunity of international crimes. The article derives from various implementations a test for determining the characteristics and functions of the correction function of international law, thus presents the argument that the Rome Statute’s complementary role provides a corrective function.

Italian Review of Legal History(10/2)
Istanbul University (TR)
University of Cambridge
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.