Monitor the energy and carbon emissions of process-based models: ProcessC

• ProcessC , a multi-platform energy usage and carbon emission tracking program for process-based models was developed. • Machine-learning models consumed and released less energy (115-fold) and less carbon emissions (29397-fold) compared to the RZ-SHAW in simulating winter drainage. • Different modelling approaches result in drastically varying energy usage and carbon emissions; future studies should consider energy efficiency. • Reducing model training or calibration time and optimizing computation locations are crucial for sustainable modelling. Sustainable modelling to reduce carbon emissions from heavy computations is being adopted in machine learning communities. However, this concept has not been considered in process-based model communities, with carbon emissions rarely monitored and reported. This study developed ProcessC, a multi-platform program to monitor energy usage and carbon emissions in process-based models’ simulations. ProcessC was tested through a case study involving a process-based model, RZ-SHAW, for winter artificial drainage simulation. Results indicated that the RZ-SHAW model consumed 115 times more energy and released 29,397 times more carbon emissions compared to machine learning (ML) models for the winter artificial drainage simulation. The study suggests deploying computing systems in regions with low grid carbon intensity, choosing energy-efficient systems, and reducing simulation time as potential solutions for a more carbon-sustainable modelling. The findings from the current study urge the process-based community to commence considering and reporting carbon emissions in future modelling studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108101
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Green IT and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitor the energy and carbon emissions of process-based models: ProcessC

Birk Li, Zhiming Qi, Ward Smith, Ziwei Li et al.
3 citations
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Green IT and Sustainability
0.63
article

Monitor the energy and carbon emissions of process-based models: ProcessC

Birk Li, Zhiming Qi, Ward Smith, Ziwei Li, Yuchen Liu, Junzeng Xu, Ruiqi Wu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• ProcessC , a multi-platform energy usage and carbon emission tracking program for process-based models was developed. • Machine-learning models consumed and released less energy (115-fold) and less carbon emissions (29397-fold) compared to the RZ-SHAW in simulating winter drainage. • Different modelling approaches result in drastically varying energy usage and carbon emissions; future studies should consider energy efficiency. • Reducing model training or calibration time and optimizing computation locations are crucial for sustainable modelling. Sustainable modelling to reduce carbon emissions from heavy computations is being adopted in machine learning communities. However, this concept has not been considered in process-based model communities, with carbon emissions rarely monitored and reported. This study developed ProcessC, a multi-platform program to monitor energy usage and carbon emissions in process-based models’ simulations. ProcessC was tested through a case study involving a process-based model, RZ-SHAW, for winter artificial drainage simulation. Results indicated that the RZ-SHAW model consumed 115 times more energy and released 29,397 times more carbon emissions compared to machine learning (ML) models for the winter artificial drainage simulation. The study suggests deploying computing systems in regions with low grid carbon intensity, choosing energy-efficient systems, and reducing simulation time as potential solutions for a more carbon-sustainable modelling. The findings from the current study urge the process-based community to commence considering and reporting carbon emissions in future modelling studies.

Resources Conservation and RecyclingVol. 215
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), Hohai University (CN), Indiana University Bloomington (US), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Green IT and Sustainability
0.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.