Moss species for bioreceptive concrete: A survey of epilithic urban moss communities and their dynamics

Research into bioreceptive materials is gaining increased interest. However, while advances are being made on the material side of bioreceptivity, the underlying ecology of urban mosses is still underexposed. This research aimed to determine how the local environment affects the species composition of urban epilithic moss communities and assess which moss species are most suitable for the colonisation of pristine (bioreceptive) concrete surfaces, leading to recommendations for moss species selection to designers and engineers of bioreceptive structures. We conducted a field survey of 137 moss communities on concrete in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague. A total of 26 different species were found, of which the acrocarp species Tortula muralis, Grimmia pulvinata, Ptychostomum capillare , and Orthotrichum diaphanum and the pleurocarp species Brachythecium rutabulum, Hypnum cupressiforme, and Rhynchostegium confertum acted as most common pioneers and also formed a part of the climax community. We found some positive associations between acrocarp species but negative associations between acrocarp and pleurocarp species. Local environmental factors only played a small role in the community composition at a species level; however, when comparing acrocarp and pleurocarp species, the former preferred more exposed sites, whereas the latter preferred more shaded habitats. As such, we recommend that bioreceptive concrete structures use acrocarp pioneers for exposed locations and pleurocarp pioneers for more shaded locations. • 137 moss communities growing on concrete in three Dutch cities were surveyed. • Seven main colonising species were identified: T. muralis, G. pulvinata, P. capillare , O. diaphanum , B. rutabulum, H. cupressiforme, and R. confertum • Local environmental drivers have limited impact on overall species distribution but do appear to affect the distribution of pleurocarp and acrocarp growth forms. • Recommendations for moss species selection are given to designers of bioreceptive concrete structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Engineering
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107502
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Lichen and fungal ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moss species for bioreceptive concrete: A survey of epilithic urban moss communities and their dynamics

H.M. Jonkers, Marc Ottelé, Juul Limpens, Elmar Veenendaal et al.
9 citations
Ecological Engineering
Lichen and fungal ecology
9.26
article

Moss species for bioreceptive concrete: A survey of epilithic urban moss communities and their dynamics

H.M. Jonkers, Marc Ottelé, Juul Limpens, Elmar Veenendaal, M. Veeger
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Research into bioreceptive materials is gaining increased interest. However, while advances are being made on the material side of bioreceptivity, the underlying ecology of urban mosses is still underexposed. This research aimed to determine how the local environment affects the species composition of urban epilithic moss communities and assess which moss species are most suitable for the colonisation of pristine (bioreceptive) concrete surfaces, leading to recommendations for moss species selection to designers and engineers of bioreceptive structures. We conducted a field survey of 137 moss communities on concrete in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague. A total of 26 different species were found, of which the acrocarp species Tortula muralis, Grimmia pulvinata, Ptychostomum capillare , and Orthotrichum diaphanum and the pleurocarp species Brachythecium rutabulum, Hypnum cupressiforme, and Rhynchostegium confertum acted as most common pioneers and also formed a part of the climax community. We found some positive associations between acrocarp species but negative associations between acrocarp and pleurocarp species. Local environmental factors only played a small role in the community composition at a species level; however, when comparing acrocarp and pleurocarp species, the former preferred more exposed sites, whereas the latter preferred more shaded habitats. As such, we recommend that bioreceptive concrete structures use acrocarp pioneers for exposed locations and pleurocarp pioneers for more shaded locations. • 137 moss communities growing on concrete in three Dutch cities were surveyed. • Seven main colonising species were identified: T. muralis, G. pulvinata, P. capillare , O. diaphanum , B. rutabulum, H. cupressiforme, and R. confertum • Local environmental drivers have limited impact on overall species distribution but do appear to affect the distribution of pleurocarp and acrocarp growth forms. • Recommendations for moss species selection are given to designers of bioreceptive concrete structures.

Ecological EngineeringVol. 212
Wageningen University & Research (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Lichen and fungal ecology
9.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.