Studio sul dibattito tra Tullo e Fufezio nel libro III della Storia antica di Roma di Dionigi di Alicarnasso

ABSTRACT A study on the debate between Tullus and Fufetius in book III of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ Roman antiquities The panorama of rhetorical studies in historical works is strongly focused on various and canonical authors (as Thucydides, Xenophon, Polybius, Herodotus), but it lacks for what concerns Dionysius of Halicarnassus and his work Roman Antiquities. The purpose of the work here presented is to offer a perspective on Dionysius himself and on how he uses λόγοι in order to help build a cohesive narration. The importance of λόγοι is proved by the analysis of the conversation occurred between Tullus, king of Romans, and Fufetius, king of Albans. Considering the war between the Romans and the Albans as the central theme of Book III, we can identify sections that serve as introductions and conclusions to the action. The group of speeches under analysis can be seen as the beginning of the ascent towards the climax of the action, which is the war.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Erga-Logoi Rivista di storia letteratura diritto e culture dell antichità
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7358/erga-2024-002-macd
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studio sul dibattito tra Tullo e Fufezio nel libro III della Storia antica di Roma di Dionigi di Alicarnasso

Denise Macciò
Erga-Logoi Rivista di storia letteratura diritto e culture dell antichità
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Studio sul dibattito tra Tullo e Fufezio nel libro III della Storia antica di Roma di Dionigi di Alicarnasso

Denise Macciò
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT A study on the debate between Tullus and Fufetius in book III of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ Roman antiquities The panorama of rhetorical studies in historical works is strongly focused on various and canonical authors (as Thucydides, Xenophon, Polybius, Herodotus), but it lacks for what concerns Dionysius of Halicarnassus and his work Roman Antiquities. The purpose of the work here presented is to offer a perspective on Dionysius himself and on how he uses λόγοι in order to help build a cohesive narration. The importance of λόγοι is proved by the analysis of the conversation occurred between Tullus, king of Romans, and Fufetius, king of Albans. Considering the war between the Romans and the Albans as the central theme of Book III, we can identify sections that serve as introductions and conclusions to the action. The group of speeches under analysis can be seen as the beginning of the ascent towards the climax of the action, which is the war.

Erga-Logoi Rivista di storia letteratura diritto e culture dell antichitàVol. 12(2)
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Studio sul dibattito tra Tullo e Fufezio nel libro III della Storia antica di Roma di Dionigi di Alicarnasso — Denise Macciò · Erga-Logoi Rivista di storia letteratura diritto e culture dell antichità (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS